ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2019
Imaging the bifid mandibular canal using high resolution MRI.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphology of the bifid mandibular canal and its relationship with mandibular third molar: A retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
- Pattern diversity and prevalence of bifid mandibular canal: a CBCT-based cross-sectional study : Evaluation of Bifid Mandibular Canal via CBCT.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Article
- Is the presence of accessory mandibular canals associated with the dimensions of the mandibular canal?Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of teeth and periodontal tissues using a microscopy coil.Imaging science in dentistry · 2024Article
- Bifid Mandibular Canal: A Proportional Meta-Analysis of Computed Tomography Studies.International journal of dentistry · 2023Review
- Prevalence of bifid and trifid mandibular canals with unusual patterns of nerve branching using cone beam computed tomography.Odontology · 2022Article
- What are the retromolar and bifid/trifid mandibular canals as seen on cone-beam computed tomography? Revisiting classic gross anatomy of the inferior alveolar nerve and correcting terminology.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2022Review
- Incidence and Anatomical Properties of Retromolar Canal in an Iranian Population: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.International journal of dentistry · 2020Article
- [Importance of cone beam computed tomography in the recognition of the trajectory and anatomical variants of the mandibular canal. A review of the literature].Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective: This study aimed to investigate the incidence of bifid mandibular canals (BMCs) using high-resolution MRI with a three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence (3D-VIBE) through the neurovascular bundle (NVB).
methods: In this retrospective study, we extracted 154 datasets from our archive of patients who underwent MRI examination with a 3D-VIBE sequence for mandible lesions from January 2015 to April 2016. The right and the left mandibles were treated independently with 59 cases excluded due to NVB morphology or artifacts, yielding 249 hemi-mandible cases classified among three subtypes: Type 0 with no BMC, Type one with one NVB and two NVBs on route to it, and Type two with two NVBs. We also investigated the incidence of nutrient canals (NCs) using MRI. Finally, we determined whether each BMC case could also be identified via panoramic radiography (PR) or CT.
results: Of the 249 cases examined, 6.4% were found to have BMC (Types 1 and 2). Subtypes were classified as follows: 233 as Type 0 (93.6%), 11 as Type 1 (4.4%), and 5 as Type 2 (2.0%). The NC was identified on MRI in a majority of cases. No BMCs were identified using PR or CT except for one, which was identified by CT.
conclusion: The incidence rate of BMC per MRI was 6.4% in this study. NCs, including the retromolar canal, had an incidence rate of 58.4-97.6%. Further, BMCs were not verified by PR or CT, indicating that MRI should be used to assess BMCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.