Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30346802›Full record

SynthesisDento maxillo facial radiology2019

Prevalence of radiographic findings on jaws exposed to antiresorptive therapy: a meta-analysis.

Kamile Leonardi Dutra, Letícia Fernanda Haas, Glaucia S Zimmermann, Gilberto Melo, Mariana Comparotto Minamisako, Carlos Flores-Mir, Márcio Corrêa

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Radiographic perception of anatomical structures and bony changes in oncologic patients under antiresorptive therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kamile Leonardi Dutra1 School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina , Florianópolis, Santa Catarina , Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3330-2059
Letícia Fernanda Haas1 School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina , Florianópolis, Santa Catarina , Brazil.
Glaucia S Zimmermann2 Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina , Florianópolis, Santa Catarina , Brazil.
Gilberto Melo1 School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina , Florianópolis, Santa Catarina , Brazil.
Mariana Comparotto Minamisako3 CEPON, Oncological Research Center , Florianópolis, Santa Catarina , Brazil.
Carlos Flores-Mir4 School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta , Edmonton, AB , Canada.
Márcio Corrêa2 Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina , Florianópolis, Santa Catarina , Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives: Determine the prevalence of radiographic findings (RF) on both jaws among patients receiving antiresorptive bone therapy.

methods: Six electronic databases and partial grey literature were searched. Data was collected based on predetermined criteria. The key features from the included studies were extracted. The MAStARI tool assessed the potential risk of bias (RoB) among the studies, while the GRADE approach determined the level of evidence.

results: 29 studies were identified and included in the qualitative analysis, totalling 1133 patients. 27 studies had sufficient data to be included in a series of meta-analysis reporting 12 types of radiographic findings, and were split in two groups based on their study design. G1 comprised descriptive observational studies and G2 analytical cross-sectional studies. Two studies presented a high RoB, 16 had a moderate RoB, and 11 had low RoB. The overall level of evidence identified was very low. The most frequent RF were mixed lytic-sclerotic areas (73.88%), followed by osteolytic changes (66.18%), osteosclerosis (65.75%), cortical bone erosion (50.83%), persisting alveolar socket (45.77%), periodontal ligament (PDL) widening (44.69%), and inferior alveolar canal (IAC) involvement (43.40%). Less frequent, but equally important, were the periosteal reaction (34.27%), lamina dura thickening (32.97%), sequestrum (29.94%), pathologic fracture (20.90%), and density confluence of cortical and cancellous bone (16.61%). 20 patients reported no signs.

conclusions: RF prevalence was high and mainly included mixed lytic-sclerotic areas, osteolysis, osteosclerosis, cortical bone erosion, persisting alveolar socket, PDL-widening, IAC-involvement. Due to the very low level of evidence (GRADE) caution should be exercised when considering these findings.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsJaw DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPrevalenceProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesBone Density Conservation Agentsantiresorptive Agentsdental radiographyjawsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30346802
PMCPMC6476350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.