ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2018
Trends in Neonatal Prophylaxis and Predictors of Combination Antiretroviral Prophylaxis in US Infants from 1990 to 2015.
Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01310023 (Surveillance Monitoring for ART Toxicities Study in HIV Uninfected Children Born to HIV Infected Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Surveillance Monitoring for ART Toxicities Study in HIV Uninfected Children Born to HIV Infected Women
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevention of Perinatal HIV Transmission in an Area of High HIV Prevalence in the United States.The Journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
- A Comparison of Metabolic Outcomes Between Obese HIV-Exposed Uninfected Youth From the PHACS SMARTT Study and HIV-Unexposed Youth From the NHANES Study in the United States.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Postnatal antiretroviral (ARV) prophylaxis for infants born to women with HIV is a critical component of perinatal HIV transmission prevention. However, variability in prophylaxis regimens remains and consistency with guidelines has not been evaluated in the United States. We evaluated trends over time in prophylaxis regimens among 6386 HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants using pooled data spanning two decades from three US-based cohorts: the Women and Infants Transmission Study (WITS, 1990-2007), Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) 219C (1993-2007), and the PHACS Surveillance Monitoring of ART Toxicities (SMARTT) study (2007-2015). We also identified maternal and infant risk factors for use of combination prophylaxis regimens (≥2 ARVs) and examined consistency with US perinatal guidelines. We found that receipt of combination prophylaxis between 1996 and 2015 ranged from 2% to 15%, with a consistent median duration of 6 weeks. Infants whose mothers had lower CD4 T-cell counts, higher viral load (VL), no antepartum ARVs, age <20 years at delivery, and Cesarean delivery had significantly higher rates of combination prophylaxis, while infants born 2006-2010 (vs. 2011-2015), who were Hispanic or with lower maternal education levels, had significantly lower rates. Predictors for combination prophylaxis varied over time, with the strongest associations of maternal VL in later birth cohorts. While use of combination prophylaxis increased over time, only 50% of high-risk infants received such regimens in 2011-2015. In conclusion, HEU infants at higher risk of HIV acquisition are more likely to receive combination neonatal prophylaxis, consistent with US guidelines. However, substantial variability remains, and infants at higher risk often fail to receive combination prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.