Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30346548›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2018

A benchmark study of k-mer counting methods for high-throughput sequencing.

Swati C Manekar, Shailesh R Sathe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Elucidating Transitions ofJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Computational function prediction of bacteria and phage proteins.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  6. Genome survey and evolutionary analysis of 8 Lamprotula species: SSR profiling, mitochondrial characterization, and population dynamics inference.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Poplar: a phylogenomics pipeline.Bioinformatics advances · 2025
    Article
  10. A survey of k-mer methods and applications in bioinformatics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  11. The genomes of Australian wild limes.Plant molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. APIPred: An XGBoost-Based Method for Predicting Aptamer-Protein Interactions.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genes · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Swati C ManekarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India.
Shailesh R SatheDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technologies means that hundreds of gigabytes of sequencing data can be produced in a single study. Many bioinformatics tools require counts of substrings of length k in DNA/RNA sequencing reads obtained for applications such as genome and transcriptome assembly, error correction, multiple sequence alignment, and repeat detection. Recently, several techniques have been developed to count k-mers in large sequencing datasets, with a trade-off between the time and memory required to perform this function. We assessed several k-mer counting programs and evaluated their relative performance, primarily on the basis of runtime and memory usage. We also considered additional parameters such as disk usage, accuracy, parallelism, the impact of compressed input, performance in terms of counting large k values and the scalability of the application to larger datasets.We make specific recommendations for the setup of a current state-of-the-art program and suggestions for further development.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsArabidopsisComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNATranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID30346548
PMCPMC6280066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.