Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30346473›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2019

Comparative analysis of repetitive sequences among species from the potato and the tomato clades.

Paola Gaiero, Magdalena Vaio, Sander A Peters, M Eric Schranz, Hans de Jong, Pablo R Speranza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative analysis of repetitive DNA in dysploid and non-dysploid Phaseolus beans.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The nature and organization of satellite DNAs inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Full-length LTR retroelements in Capsicum annuum revealed a few species-specific family bursts with insertional preferences.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paola GaieroLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), Droevendaalsesteeg, PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Magdalena VaioLaboratorio de Evolución y Domesticación de las Plantas, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Garzón, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Sander A PetersApplied Bioinformatics, Department of Bioscience, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), Droevendaalsesteeg, PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
M Eric SchranzBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), Droevendaalsesteeg, PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Hans de JongLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), Droevendaalsesteeg, PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Pablo R SperanzaLaboratorio de Evolución y Domesticación de las Plantas, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Garzón, Montevideo, Uruguay.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe genus Solanum includes important vegetable crops and their wild relatives. Introgression of their useful traits into elite cultivars requires effective recombination between hom(e)ologues, which is partially determined by genome sequence differentiation. In this study we compared the repetitive genome fractions of wild and cultivated species of the potato and tomato clades in a phylogenetic context.

methodsGenome skimming followed by a clustering approach was used as implemented in the RepeatExplorer pipeline. Repeat classes were annotated and the sequences of their main domains were compared. KEY

resultsRepeat abundance and genome size were correlated and the larger genomes of species in the tomato clade were found to contain a higher proportion of unclassified elements. Families and lineages of repetitive elements were largely conserved between the clades, but their relative proportions differed. The most abundant repeats were Ty3/Gypsy elements. Striking differences in abundance were found in the highly dynamic Ty3/Gypsy Chromoviruses and Ty1/Copia Tork elements. Within the potato clade, early branching Solanum cardiophyllum showed a divergent repeat profile. There were also contrasts between cultivated and wild potatoes, mostly due to satellite amplification in the cultivated species. Interspersed repeat profiles were very similar among potatoes. The repeat profile of Solanum etuberosum was more similar to that of the potato clade.

conclusionsThe repeat profiles in Solanum seem to be very similar despite genome differentiation at the level of collinearity. Removal of transposable elements by unequal recombination may have been responsible for structural rearrangements across the tomato clade. Sequence variability in the tomato clade is congruent with clade-specific amplification of repeats after its divergence from S. etuberosum and potatoes. The low differentiation among potato and its wild relatives at the level of interspersed repeats may explain the difficulty in discriminating their genomes by genomic in situ hybridization techniques.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, PlantRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNA, PlantPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASolanaceaeSolanumSolanum lycopersicumDNA, Plantcrop wild relativesrelative abundancerepeat profilesSolanumSolanum etuberosumSolanum lycopersicumSolanum tuberosumtransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID30346473
PMCPMC6377101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.