Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30346330›Full record

ArticleCancer nursing

Issues in Recruiting and Retaining Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors in a Technology-Based Intervention Study.

Eun-Ok Im, Sangmi Kim, Shu Xu, Chiyoung Lee, Yuko Hamajima, Ayako Inohara, Kathleen Chang, Eunice Chee, Wonshik Chee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Information Needs of Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors: a Decision Tree Analysis.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 20 Years Later: Continued Relevance of Cancer, Culture, and Literacy in Cancer Education for Social Justice and Health Equity.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eun-Ok ImAuthor Affiliation: School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Drs Im, Kim, and W. Chee; Mss Xu, Lee, Hamajima, Inohara, and Chang); and North Carolina State University, Raleigh (Ms E. Chee).
Sangmi Kim
Shu Xu
Chiyoung Lee
Yuko Hamajima
Ayako Inohara
Kathleen Chang
Eunice Chee
Wonshik Chee
Duke University · US

Funding

To enhance breast cancer survivorship of Asian AmericansR01CA203719 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI IM, EUN-OK · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifficulties in recruiting and retaining Asian Americans in traditional research have been well documented. Despite an increasing number of technology-based cancer studies among racial/ethnic minorities, little is still known about potential issues in recruiting and retaining racial/ethnic minority cancer survivors for technology-based intervention research.

objectiveThis discussion article aims to examine issues in recruiting and retaining a group of racial/ethnic minorities-Asian American breast cancer survivors-for a technology-based intervention study.

methodsThe parent study is an ongoing large-scale, national-scope, technology-based intervention study among a target number of 330 Asian American breast cancer survivors. During the recruitment and retention process, research diaries were written by research team members, and the written records of weekly research team meetings were kept. The written records were analyzed using a content analysis. Then, the themes were used to support the discussion points made in the article.

resultsThere existed subethnic differences in research participation; it was easier to recruit Chinese participants compared with other subethnic groups. The use of culturally matched research team members and multiple languages was essential. Gatekeepers were also elemental for recruitment and retention. Various motivation strategies were needed to retain the participants. Each subethnic group used different communication apps. Finally, trust building was essential to retain the participants in the intervention.

conclusionsResearchers need to consider these practical issues in future technology-based intervention research. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These issues need to be considered in future program/intervention development and implementation among racial/ethnic minority cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAsianBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsCommunicationFemaleHumansPatient ParticipationPatient Selection

Identifiers

PMID30346330
PMCPMC6475488
OpenAlexW2896217763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.