Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30345943›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2018

Do manufacturer 'nutrient claims' influence the efficacy of mandated front-of-package labels?

Rachel B Acton, David Hammond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nutrition-Related Information on Alcoholic Beverages in Victoria, Australia, 2021.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel B ActonSchool of Public Health and Health Systems,University of Waterloo,200 University Ave. W,Waterloo,ON,Canada,N2L 3G1.ORCID 0000-0002-2876-5668
David HammondSchool of Public Health and Health Systems,University of Waterloo,200 University Ave. W,Waterloo,ON,Canada,N2L 3G1.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine consumers' ability to correctly interpret front-of-package (FOP) 'high in' warnings in the presence of a voluntary claim for the same or a different nutrient.

designA between-group experimental task assigned respondents to view food products labelled as 'high in sodium', with a 'reduced sodium' claim positioned next to the warning, away from the warning or absent. A second experiment assigned participants to view a food product labelled as 'high in sugar', with a 'reduced fat' claim positioned next to the warning, away from the warning or absent. For both tasks, respondents were asked to identify whether the products were high in the indicated nutrient.

settingOnline survey (2016). SUBJECTS: Canadians aged 16-32 years (n 1000) were recruited in person from five major cities in Canada.

resultsRespondents were less likely to correctly identify a product as 'high in sodium' when packages also featured a voluntary 'reduced sodium' claim, with a stronger effect when the claim was positioned away from the FOP symbol (P<0·001). The number of correct responses was similar across conditions when the nutrient claim was for a different nutrient than the one featured in the FOP 'high in' warning.

conclusionsThe findings demonstrate that the presence of a voluntary nutrient claim can undermine the efficacy of mandated FOP labels for the same nutrient. Countries considering nutrient-specific FOP warnings, including Canada, should consider regulations that would prohibit claims for nutrients that exceed the threshold for nutrient-specific FOP warnings.

Indexed as

Nutritive ValueAdolescentAdultCanadaChoice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorDietary FatsDietary SugarsFood LabelingFood PreferencesHumansSodium, DietarySurveys and QuestionnairesDietary FatsDietary SugarsSodium, DietaryFood labellingHealth policyNutrient claimsNutrition policy

Identifiers

PMID30345943
PMCPMC10260817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.