Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30345874›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of men's health

Discerning Disparities: The Data Gap.

Henrie M Treadwell, Marguerite Ro, LaTonya Sallad, Erica McCray, Cheryl Franklin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Risk factors for adverse outcomes among pregnant and postpartum women with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19 in Brazil.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henrie M Treadwell1 Morehouse School of Medicine, Director, Community Voices & Men's Health Initiative, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Marguerite Ro2 Chief, Seattle & King County, Assessment, Policy Development & Evaluation Unit, Director, King County Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention Section, Seattle, WA, USA.
LaTonya Sallad3 Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Erica McCray3 Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Cheryl Franklin3 Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Morehouse School of Medicine · USPublic Health – Seattle & King County · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health disparities that focus on gender and on the ancillary dependent variables of race and ethnicity reflect continually early illness, compromised quality of life, and often premature and preventable deaths. The inability of the nation to eliminate disparities also track along race and gender in communities where a limited number of health-care providers and policymakers identify as being from these traditionally underserved and marginalized population groups. Epidemiologists and other researchers and analysts have traditionally failed to integrate the social determinants of health and other variables known to support upward mobility in their predictive analyses of health status. The poor, and poor men of color particularly, begin a descent to invisibility and separation that has been witnessed since the early days of this nation. This history has the majority of men of color mired in poverty or near poverty and has more substantively and explicitly affected both American Indians and Africans forced into immigration into the United States and into slavery. Other racial and ethnic groups including large distinct ethnic groups of Asian Americans and Hispanics/Latinx do not have their treatment by systems fully reported from a health and social justice perspective simply because the systems do not disaggregate by race and ethnicity. It is axiomatic that examining disparities through the lens of race, ethnicity, and gender provides a unique opportunity to reflect upon what is known about boys' and men's health, particularly men from communities of color, and about payment systems. Integration of all populations into the enumeration of morbidity, mortality, and disparity indices is a dynamic reflection of the vision and exclusive actions of decision makers.

Indexed as

Men's HealthNeeds AssessmentBlack or African AmericanHealth Status DisparitiesHumansIncidenceIndians, North AmericanMaleRisk AssessmentSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Statesgender issues and sexual orientationhealth-care issueshealth inequality/disparityhealth policy issuesmarginalizationmen of colorquantitative researchspecial populations

Identifiers

PMID30345874
PMCPMC6771124
OpenAlexW2896113937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.