Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30345726›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

"Change is what can actually make the tough times better": A patient-centred patient safety intervention delivered in collaboration with hospital volunteers.

Gemma Louch, Mohammed A Mohammed, Lesley Hughes, Jane O'Hara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "Change is what can actually make the tough times better": A patient-centred patient safety intervention delivered in collaboration with hospital volunteers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gemma LouchBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6946-3693
Mohammed A MohammedBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
Lesley HughesBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
Jane O'HaraBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
Bradford Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Bradford · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

The Health Foundation Closing the Gap in Patient Safety Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PRASE (Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment) intervention provides a way to systematically collect patient feedback to support service improvement. To provide a sustainable mechanism for the PRASE intervention, a 2-year improvement project explored the potential for hospital volunteers to facilitate the collection of PRASE feedback.

objectiveTo explore the implementation of the PRASE intervention delivered in collaboration with hospital volunteers from the perspectives of key stakeholders.

designA qualitative case study design was utilized across three acute NHS trusts in the United Kingdom between March 2016 and October 2016. Ward level data (staff interviews; action planning meeting recordings; implementation fidelity information) were analysed taking a pen portrait approach. We also carried out focus groups with hospital volunteers and interviews with voluntary services/patient experience staff, which were analysed thematically.

resultsWhilst most ward staff reported feeling engaged with the intervention, there were discordant views on its use and usefulness. The hospital volunteers were positive about their involvement, and on some wards, worked with staff to produce actions to improve services. The voluntary services/patient experience staff participants emphasised the need for PRASE to sit within an organisations' wider governance structure.

conclusionFrom the perspective of key stakeholders, hospital volunteers facilitating the collection of PRASE feedback is a feasible means of implementing the PRASE intervention. However, the variability around ward staff being able to use the feedback to make changes to services demonstrates that it is this latter part of the PRASE intervention cycle that is more problematic.

Indexed as

HospitalsHospital VolunteersPatient SafetyQualitative ResearchSafety ManagementFocus GroupsHumansState MedicineUnited Kingdomevaluationimprovement sciencepatient feedbackpatient involvementpatient safetyvolunteers

Identifiers

PMID30345726
PMCPMC6351415
OpenAlexW2896650122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.