Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30345693›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical statistics2019

Blinded continuous monitoring in clinical trials with recurrent event endpoints.

Tim Friede, Dieter A Häring, Heinz Schmidli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical statistics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tim FriedeDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5347-7441
Dieter A HäringBiostatistics Neuroscience Development Unit, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Heinz SchmidliStatistical Methodology, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0934-1066

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In studies with recurrent event endpoints, misspecified assumptions of event rates or dispersion can lead to underpowered trials or overexposure of patients. Specification of overdispersion is often a particular problem as it is usually not reported in clinical trial publications. Changing event rates over the years have been described for some diseases, adding to the uncertainty in planning. To mitigate the risks of inadequate sample sizes, internal pilot study designs have been proposed with a preference for blinded sample size reestimation procedures, as they generally do not affect the type I error rate and maintain trial integrity. Blinded sample size reestimation procedures are available for trials with recurrent events as endpoints. However, the variance in the reestimated sample size can be considerable in particular with early sample size reviews. Motivated by a randomized controlled trial in paediatric multiple sclerosis, a rare neurological condition in children, we apply the concept of blinded continuous monitoring of information, which is known to reduce the variance in the resulting sample size. Assuming negative binomial distributions for the counts of recurrent relapses, we derive information criteria and propose blinded continuous monitoring procedures. The operating characteristics of these are assessed in Monte Carlo trial simulations demonstrating favourable properties with regard to type I error rate, power, and stopping time, ie, sample size.

Indexed as

Age FactorsBiostatisticsComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalEndpoint DeterminationFingolimod HydrochlorideHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsModels, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceResearch DesignSample SizeTime FactorsFingolimod HydrochlorideImmunosuppressive Agentsclinical trialsinformationmultiple sclerosisnegative binomialsample size reestimation

Identifiers

PMID30345693
PMCPMC6587844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.