Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30345528›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied toxicology : JAT2019

Comparison of the metabolism of 10 chemicals in human and pig skin explants.

C Géniès, E L Jamin, L Debrauwer, D Zalko, E N Person, J Eilstein, S Grégoire, A Schepky, D Lange, C Ellison and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied toxicology : JAT, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stratified quantification of targets in skin by three-dimensional Raman spectroscopic imaging.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Article
  5. Immunometabolism of Liver Xenotransplantation and Prospective Solutions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Next generation risk assessment: anFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Toxicological risk assessment using the example of potential contact sensitization to resorcinol].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

C GénièsPierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3535-4530
E L JaminToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
L DebrauwerToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
D ZalkoToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
E N PersonToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
J EilsteinL'Oreal, Aulnay-Sous-Bois, France.
S GrégoireL'Oreal, Aulnay-Sous-Bois, France.
A SchepkyBeiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.
D LangeBeiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.
C EllisonThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
A RoeThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
S SalhiGSK, Nyon, Switzerland.
R CubberleyUnilever, Sharnbrook, UK.
N J HewittCosmetics Europe, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1045-0748
H RotheCoty, Darmstadt, Germany.
M KlaricCosmetics Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
H DuplanPierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique, Toulouse, France.
C Jacques-JaminPierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique, Toulouse, France.
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRPierre Fabre (France) · FRBeiersdorf (Germany) · DECosmetics Europe · BEL'Oréal (France) · FRProcter & Gamble (United States) · USGymnase de Nyon · CHTechnische Universität Darmstadt · DEUnilever (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin metabolism is important to consider when assessing local toxicity and/or penetration of chemicals and their metabolites. If human skin supply is limited, pig skin can be used as an alternative. To identify any species differences, we have investigated the metabolism of 10 chemicals in a pig and human skin explant model. Phase I metabolic pathways in skin from both species included those known to occur via cytochrome P450s, esterases, alcohol dehydrogenases and aldehyde dehydrogenases. Common Phase II pathways were glucuronidation and sulfation but other conjugation pathways were also identified. Chemicals not metabolized by pig skin (caffeine, IQ and 4-chloroaniline) were also not metabolized by human skin. Six chemicals metabolized by pig skin were metabolized to a similar extent (percentage parent remaining) by human skin. Human skin metabolites were also detected in pig skin incubations, except for one unidentified minor vanillin metabolite. Three cinnamyl alcohol metabolites were unique to pig skin but represented minor metabolites. There were notable species differences in the relative amounts of common metabolites. The difference in the abundance of the sulfate conjugates of resorcinol and 4-amino-3-nitrophenol was in accordance with the known lack of aryl sulfotransferase activity in pigs. In conclusion, while qualitative comparisons of metabolic profiles were consistent between pig and human skin, there were some quantitative differences in the percentage of metabolites formed. This preliminary assessment suggests that pig skin is metabolically competent and could be a useful tool for evaluating potential first-pass metabolism before testing in human-derived tissues.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAnimalsCosmeticsCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemGlucuronosyltransferaseHumansMetabolic Detoxication, Phase IMetabolic Detoxication, Phase IIOrgan Culture TechniquesSkinSkin AbsorptionSpecies SpecificitySubstrate SpecificitySulfotransferasesSwineTissue DistributionCosmeticsCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemGlucuronosyltransferaseSulfotransferasescomparisoncosmetics chemicalshumanpigskin metabolism

Identifiers

PMID30345528
PMCPMC6587507
OpenAlexW2896526282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.