Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30345518›Full record

ReviewJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2019

Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects.

Michael S C Thomas, Daniel Ansari, Victoria C P Knowland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Integrating in vivo and in silico: a comprehensive study of Helix aspersa mucin's therapeutic properties.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Why does the brain matter for education?The British journal of educational psychology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Amplifying School Mental Health Literacy Through Neuroscience Education.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Reflections on the past two decades of Mind, Brain, and Education.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Editorial: Reviews in neuropsychology.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael S C ThomasCentre for Educational Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Science, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Daniel AnsariDepartment of Psychology & Faculty of Education Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Victoria C P KnowlandDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.

Funding

WEST COAST CENTER FOR PALLIATIVE MEDICINE EDUCATIONR25CA067068 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MEYERS, FREDERICK J · 1994 to 1996
–
CIHRMedical Research Council WPEA_P67068Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Educational neuroscience is an interdisciplinary research field that seeks to translate research findings on neural mechanisms of learning to educational practice and policy and to understand the effects of education on the brain. Neuroscience and education can interact directly, by virtue of considering the brain as a biological organ that needs to be in the optimal condition to learn ('brain health'); or indirectly, as neuroscience shapes psychological theory and psychology influences education. In this article, we trace the origins of educational neuroscience, its main areas of research activity and the principal challenges it faces as a translational field. We consider how a pure psychology approach that ignores neuroscience is at risk of being misleading for educators. We address the major criticisms of the field comprising, respectively, a priori arguments against the relevance of neuroscience to education, reservations with the current practical operation of the field, and doubts about the viability of neuroscience methods for diagnosing disorders or predicting individual differences. We consider future prospects of the field and ethical issues it raises. Finally, we discuss the challenge of responding to the (welcome) desire of education policymakers to include neuroscience evidence in their policymaking, while ensuring recommendations do not exceed the limitations of current basic science.

Indexed as

BrainNeurosciencesPsychology, EducationalSchoolsTranslational Research, BiomedicalAdolescentChildHumansEducational neuroscienceinterventionneuromythspolicytranslation

Identifiers

PMID30345518
PMCPMC6487963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.