Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30345471›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2018

Evaluation of zero-echo-time attenuation correction for integrated PET/MR brain imaging-comparison to head atlas and

João M Sousa, Lieuwe Appel, Mathias Engström, Stergios Papadimitriou, Dag Nyholm, Elna-Marie Larsson, Håkan Ahlström, Mark Lubberink

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06988007 (Bone Arches), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06988007 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Bone Arches: Performance of Pseudo-scanner Sequences in Segmenting the Extent of the Tumour and in Planning Surgical Resection Using the CT Scan as a Reference

TypeinterventionalSponsorCliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de LouvainRan2027 to 2027Enrolled122ConditionsSarcomaArmsWhole body MRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Florbetaben amyloid PET acquisition time: Influence on Centiloids and interpretation.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Evaluation of [EJNMMI research · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Tau PET imaging withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  8. Evaluation of Arterial Spin Labeling MRI-Comparison withDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. MR-based Attenuation Correction for Brain PET Using 3D Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Network.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Attenuation correction for human PET/MRI studies.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

João M SousaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. joao.sousa@surgsci.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1498-1327
Lieuwe AppelDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mathias EngströmMR Applied Science Laboratory, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, USA.
Stergios PapadimitriouDepartment of Neurosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Dag NyholmDepartment of Neurosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elna-Marie LarssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Håkan AhlströmDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mark LubberinkDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMRI does not offer a direct method to obtain attenuation correction maps as its predecessors (stand-alone PET and PET/CT), and bone visualisation is particularly challenging. Recently, zero-echo-time (ZTE) was suggested for MR-based attenuation correction (AC). The aim of this work was to evaluate ZTE- and atlas-AC by comparison to

resultsBoth ZTE- and atlas-AC showed a similar bias of 6-8% in SUV values across the regions. Correlation coefficients with

conclusionsAbsolute SUV values showed less variability for ZTE-AC than for atlas-AC when compared to

Indexed as

Atlas-ACAttenuation correctionPET/MRStatic imagingZTE-AC

Identifiers

PMID30345471
PMCPMC6196145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.