ArticlePediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition2018
Comparing Compliance and Efficacy of Isocaloric Oral Nutritional Supplementation Using 1.5 kcal/mL or 1 kcal/mL Sip Feeds in Mildly to Moderately Malnourished Indonesian Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06160765 (The Efficacy of High Density Formula1.5 kcal/ml or 1 kcal/ml On Catch Up Growth In Growth Faltering Children With Feeding Difficulties), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Efficacy of High Density Formula1.5 kcal/ml or 1 kcal/ml On Catch Up Growth In Growth Faltering Children With Feeding Difficulties
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastrointestinal Tolerance and Refeeding Syndrome in Severely Malnourished Children Treated with Oral Nutrition Supplements Compared to F-75/F-100: A Hospital-Based Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- Early combined parenteral and enteral nutrition support for patients over 80 years old with non-operative intestinal obstruction.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- High-calorie, whole protein/peptide nutritional formulations for children with cerebral palsy: a retrospective clinical study.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Oral nutritional supplementation with dietary counseling improves linear catch-up growth and health outcomes in children with or at risk of undernutrition: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Nutritional status and function after high-calorie formula vs. Chinese food intervention in undernourished children with cerebral palsy.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study set out to evaluate the compliance to, and efficacy of oral supplementation, using a 1.5 kcal/mL or 1 kcal/mL sip feed, in children with mild to moderate malnutrition.
methodsThis was a parallel, randomized, controlled open-label trial in children aged 3 to 6 years with a weight for height Z (WHZ) score <-1 and ≥-3, who were randomized to receive a total of 600 kcal/day from either a 1.5 kcal/mL or a 1.0 kcal/mL pediatric sip feed for 28 days. Assessments included daily study product intake, body weight, tolerance and dietary intake from solid food.
resultsOf 110 children recruited, 98 (mean±standard deviation of age 49±7 months) completed the study. Both sip feeds were well tolerated, with high compliance (80±24% and 81±22% of prescribed volume in 1.5 kcal/mL and 1.0 kcal/mL groups respectively,
conclusionIn children with mild to moderate malnutrition, both 1.5 kcal/mL and 1 kcal/mL pediatric sip feeds had high compliance and were well tolerated, and were equally effective in promoting weight gain in the 28 days study period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.