ArticleStandards in genomic sciences2018
Insights into the draft genome sequence of bioactives-producing
Article in Standards in genomic sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scalable production of pectinases fromFood science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Genome mining of Bacillus thuringiensis strain SY49.1 reveals novel candidate pesticidal and bioactive compounds.Pest management science · 2025Article
- Characterization of the Novel Leaderless Bacteriocin, Bawcin, fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Transporter Protein-Guided Genome Mining for Head-to-Tail Cyclized Bacteriocins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- ORFograph: search for novel insecticidal protein genes in genomic and metagenomic assembly graphs.Microbiome · 2021Article
- Genomics and Proteomics Analyses Revealed Novel Candidate Pesticidal Proteins in a Lepidopteran-ToxicToxins · 2020Article
- Metagenomic Insights and Genomic Analysis of Phosphogypsum and Its Associated Plant Endophytic Microbiomes Reveals Valuable Actors for Waste Bioremediation.Microorganisms · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.