ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018
Inverse Prognostic Relationships of
Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic significance of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography parameters in patients with biliary tract cancers: a meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2024Pooled it
- Progress in the application of fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography in biliary tract cancer.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Four-dimensional quantitative analysis using FDG-PET in clinical oncology.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Imaging Features and Prognostic Value of FDG PET/CT in Patients with Intravascular Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Diagnostic Performance and Prognostic Relevance of FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Patients with Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Clinical Applications of Technetium-99m Quantitative Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAs there were few previous studies with a small number of subjects, the purpose of this was to evaluate the prognostic significance of
methodsThe study included 40 patients (M/F = 24:16; age 68.0 ± 8.0 years) who underwent preoperative
resultsA total of 15 of 40 patients (37.5%) died during the follow-up period. In univariate analysis, low SUV
conclusionThe SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.