ArticleOncology letters2018
Trends of incidence and survival in patients with gastrointestinal mucinous adenocarcinoma.
Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Giant retroperitoneal mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Epidemiologic characteristics and risk factors associated with overall survival for patients with mucinous colorectal cancer: A population-based study.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Immunophenotypic profiles and prognosis for colorectal mucinous adenocarcinomas are dependent on anatomic location.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Prognostic Factors and Survival in Gastrointestinal Extrapulmonary Small Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Development and validation of prognostic nomograms in patients with gallbladder mucinous adenocarcinoma: A population-based study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Delayed diagnosis of ascending colon mucinous adenocarcinoma with local abscess as primary manifestation: Report of three cases.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The epidemiology and clinical outcome of gastrointestinal mucinous adenocarcinoma (MA) are not well illustrated. The present study aimed to explore the evolving epidemiology and prognostic factors that affect the survival of patients with MA in the gastrointestinal tract. A retrospective and population-based study was conducted to determine the annual age-adjusted incidence, overall survival (OS) and survival trend of gastrointestinal mucinous MA using nationally representative data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program between 2000 and 2014. A Kaplan-Meier curve and a Cox proportional regression model were used to evaluate prognostic factors for this disease. Of the 51632 cases, females accounted for 50.5% (26058). The annual incidence of MA steadily decreased from 2000 to 2014. This trend occurred across all stages, grades and sites, apart from the appendix. In the SEER 18 registry grouping (2000-2014), the highest incidence was 3.333 per 100,000 persons for the colon. The median OS varied significantly between different primary sites, stages, grades, and age of clinical diagnosis, and the time period of diagnosis, according to a multivariable analysis. The five-year OS of gastrointestinal MA improved gradually between 2000 and 2014. The improvement in survival over the same interval was more pronounced in the subgroup of distant gastrointestinal MA. All sites along the alimentary tract, with the exception of the appendix, showed a decrease in the incidence of MA. Improved survival rates were observed for most of the gastrointestinal tract, especially for patients with advanced stage disease. MA in the upper gastrointestinal tract was less frequent but had poorer survival than colorectal MA. Clinicians should consider the primary tumour site when making therapeutic guidelines and treatment decisions for gastrointestinal MA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.