Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30344712›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Aberrant cystatin-C expression in blood from patients with breast cancer is a suitable marker for monitoring tumor burden.

Woo Sun Kwon, Tae Soo Kim, Chung Hyun Nahm, Yeonsook Moon, Jin Ju Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Woo Sun KwonSong-Dang Institute for Cancer Research, Cancer Metastasis Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Tae Soo KimSong-Dang Institute for Cancer Research, Cancer Metastasis Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Chung Hyun NahmDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Yeonsook MoonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Jin Ju KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Inha University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of circulating cystatin-C as a tumor monitoring biomarker at different clinical time points in patients with breast cancer over a long-term follow-up period. In addition, the secretory rate of circulating cystatin-C from cancer tissue was investigated by comparing the blood and tissue expression levels of cystatin-C. Blood samples from healthy volunteers (40 males and 40 females) were obtained at yearly health examinations if laboratory and imaging abnormalities were not detected. Blood samples from 34 patients with breast cancer were obtained at 205 different time points of clinical progression. Blood levels of cystatin-C were measured using ELISA and the tissue levels were measured using immunohistochemistry. No age-associated effect was observed in male and female blood cystatin-C levels. The positivity rate was 46% in patients (38/83) and 40% in samples collected at different time points (82/205). Blood cystatin-C levels were lowest following surgery compared with patients with systemic metastasis (P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates of ELISA were 53.6, 63.6 and 53.9%, respectively. The concordance rate between blood and tissue expression was 38%. The main reason for discordance between tissue and serum expression of cytostatin-C came from low serum positivity in samples showing tissue cytostatin-C (3/11, 27%). The specificity between cytostatin-C and CA-125 was highest in tumor absence state. In conclusion, elevated blood levels of cystatin-C were observed in 40% of breast cancer cases and were tumor-volume dependent. However, the concordance rate between tissue and blood was quite low, suggesting tumor heterogeneity of cystatin-C expression or co-acting pathway activation, such as cathepsin D. As one-third of breast cancer tissues express cystatin-C without cancer antigen 15-3 elevation, cystatin-C may represent a good tumor-monitoring marker in breast cancer.

Indexed as

bloodbreast cancercystatin-Ctumor monitoring

Identifiers

PMID30344712
PMCPMC6176264
OpenAlexW2889176828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.