Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30344518›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Microencapsulation of Lactic Acid Bacteria Improves the Gastrointestinal Delivery and

Nina D Coelho-Rocha, Camila P de Castro, Luis C L de Jesus, Sophie Y Leclercq, Savio H de Cicco Sandes, Alvaro C Nunes, Vasco Azevedo, Mariana M Drumond, Pamela Mancha-Agresti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Therapeutic potential ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2026
    Article
  3. Current research in food science · 2023
    Article
  4. Immobilization ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intake ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nina D Coelho-RochaLaboratório de Genética Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Camila P de CastroLaboratório de Genética Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Luis C L de JesusLaboratório de Genética Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Sophie Y LeclercqLaboratório de Inovação Biotecnológica, Fundação Ezequiel Dias, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Savio H de Cicco SandesLaboratório de Genética Molecular de Protozoários Parasitas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Alvaro C NunesLaboratório de Genética Molecular de Protozoários Parasitas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Vasco AzevedoLaboratório de Genética Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Mariana M DrumondLaboratório de Genética Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Pamela Mancha-AgrestiLaboratório de Genética Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BREzequiel Dias Foundation · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microencapsulation process of bacteria has been used for many years, mainly in the food industry and, among the different matrixes used, sodium alginate stands out. This matrix forms a protective wall around the encapsulated bacterial culture, increasing its viability and protecting against environmental adversities, such as low pH, for example. The aim of the present study was to evaluate both

Indexed as

DNA deliverymCherry reporter proteinpExu vectorrecombinant Lactococcus lactissodium alginate encapsulation

Identifiers

PMID30344518
PMCPMC6182071
OpenAlexW2895222452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.