Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30344479›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2018

Competing Endogenous RNA Regulations in Neurodegenerative Disorders: Current Challenges and Emerging Insights.

Yifei Cai, Jun Wan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Multimerin-1 and cancer: a review.Bioscience reports · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Role of Non-coding RNAs in Axon Regeneration after Peripheral Nerve Injury.International journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Identification and Analysis ofFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yifei CaiShenzhen Key Laboratory for Neuronal Structural Biology, Biomedical Research Institute, Shenzhen Peking University - The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, Shenzhen, China.
Jun WanShenzhen Key Laboratory for Neuronal Structural Biology, Biomedical Research Institute, Shenzhen Peking University - The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, Shenzhen, China.
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed exciting breakthroughs that have contributed to the richness and complexity of a burgeoning modern RNA world, and one particular breakthrough-the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) hypothesis-has been described as the "Rosetta Stone" for decoding the RNA language used in regulating RNA crosstalk and modulating biological functions. The proposed far-reaching mechanism unites diverse RNA species and provides new insights into previously unrecognized RNA-RNA interactions and RNA regulatory networks that perhaps determine gene expression in an organized, hierarchical manner. The recently uncovered ceRNA regulatory loops and networks have emphasized the power of ceRNA regulation in a wide range of developmental stages and pathological contexts, such as in tumorigenesis and neurodegenerative disorders. Although the ceRNA hypothesis drastically enhanced our understanding of RNA biology, shortly after the hypothesis was proposed, disputes arose in relation mainly to minor discrepancies in the reported effects of ceRNA regulation under physiological conditions, and this resulted in ceRNA regulation becoming an extensively studied and fast-growing research field. Here, we focus on the evidence supporting ceRNA regulation in neurodegenerative disorders and address three critical points related to the ceRNA regulatory mechanism: the microRNA (miRNA) and ceRNA hierarchies in cross-regulations; the balance between destabilization and stable binding in ceRNA-miRNA interactions; and the true extent to which ceRNA regulatory mechanisms are involved in both health and disease, and the experimental shortcomings in current ceRNA studies.

Indexed as

ceRNA debatecompeting endogenous RNA (ceRNA)miRNA hierarchymiRNA stabilizationneurodegenerative disorder

Identifiers

PMID30344479
PMCPMC6182084
OpenAlexW2894718706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.