ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2018
Comparison of the Effects of Subconjunctival Injections of Bevacizumab and Interferon Alpha-2a on Corneal Angiogenesis in a Rat Model.
Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenge of Corneal Ulcer Healing: A Novel Conceptual Framework, the "Triad" of Corneal Ulcer Healing/Corneal Neovascularization/Intraocular Pressure, and Avascular Tendon Healing, for Evaluation of Corneal Ulcer Therapy, Therapy of Neovascularization, Glaucoma Therapy, and Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 Efficacy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveCorneal neovascularization (CNV) is a vision-threatening condition arising from various corneal diseases. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of bevacizumab and interferon alpha-2a (IFNα-2a) treatment on corneal neovascularization. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-four Wistar albino rats were used in this study. After cauterization of the cornea with a silver nitrate applicator stick, the control group received 0.1 mL saline solution, the second group received 0.1 mL IFNα-2a (IFNα-2a, 6 million international units [MIU]/0.5 mL), and the third group received 2.5 mg bevacizumab by subconjunctival injection. An additional injection was administered to each group on the fourth day. After one week, the corneal neovascularization rate and the longest neovascular sprout length were determined.
resultsThe neovascularization rate (saline 0.65 ± 0.05; IFNα-2a 0.62 ± 0.07; bevacizumab 0.42 ± 0.11) with bevacizumab was significantly lower, more than those with IFNα-2a and saline (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). The longest neovascular sprout length (saline, 4.00 ± 0.6 mm; IFNα-2a, 3.63 ± 0.52 mm; bevacizumab, 2.81 ± 0.65 mm) with bevacizumab was significantly shorter than those with saline and IFNα-2a (p = 0.001 and p = 0.012).
conclusionsSubconjunctival IFNα-2a has limited efficacy in the treatment of corneal neovascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.