Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30343983›Full record

ReviewPsychoneuroendocrinology2019

Telomere length measurement by qPCR - Summary of critical factors and recommendations for assay design.

Jue Lin, Dana L Smith, Kyle Esteves, Stacy Drury

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Social support and telomere length: a meta-analysis.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Practitioner Review: Infant mental health meets cell and molecular biology - a look to the future.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jue LinDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, United States. Electronic address: jue.lin@ucsf.edu.
Dana L SmithDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, United States.
Kyle EstevesDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States.
Stacy DruryDepartment of Psychiatry, Tulane University Brain Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States.

Funding

Inflammation, Aging, Microbes, Obstructive Lung Disease and Diffusion Abnormalities (I AM OLD-DA) Study - Diversity SupplementR01HL128156 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HUANG, LAURENCE, HUNT, PETER W · 2015 to 2024
$7.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in the last decade has explored the length of telomeres, the protective ends of eukaryotic chromosomes, as a biomarker for the cumulative effects of environmental exposures and life experiences as well as a risk factor for major diseases. With a growing interest in telomere biology across biomedical, epidemiological and public health research, it is critical to ensure that the measurement of telomere length is performed with high precision and accuracy. Of the several major methods utilized to determine telomere length, quantitative PCR (qPCR) remains the most cost-effective and suitable method for large-scale epidemiological and population studies. However, inconsistencies in recent reports utilizing the qPCR method highlight the need for a careful methodological analysis of each step of this process. In this review, we summarize each critical step in qPCR telomere length assay, including sample type selection, sample collection, storage, processing issues and assay procedures. We provide guidance and recommendations for each step based on current knowledge. It is clear that a collaborative and rigorous effort is needed to characterize and resolve existing issues related to sample storage, both before and after DNA extraction, as well as the impact of different extraction protocols, reagents and post extraction processing across all tissue types (e.g. blood, saliva, buccal swabs, etc.) to provide the needed data upon which best practices for TL analyses can be agreed upon. Additionally, we suggest that the whole telomere research community be invited to collaborate on the development and implementation of standardized protocols for the assay itself as well as for reporting in scientific journals. The existing evidence provides substantial support for the continuation of telomere research across a range of different exposures and health outcomes. However, as with any technological or methodologic advance in science, reproducibility, reliability and rigor need to be established to ensure the highest quality research.

Indexed as

HumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsSpecimen HandlingTelomereTelomere HomeostasisAgingAnalytical factorsBiomarkerPreanalytical factorsQuantitative PCRTelomere length measurement

Identifiers

PMID30343983
PMCPMC6363640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.