Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30343643›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2018

Can "Indirect" Contact Laser Surgery be Used for Fluorescence-Image Guided Tumor Resections? Preliminary Results.

Vadim V Elagin, Maria A Shakhova, Marina A Sirotkina, Andrey V Shakhov, Nadezhda P Pavlova, Ludmila B Snopova, Vladimir I Bredikhin, Vladislav A Kamensky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vadim V Elagin1 Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0003-2676-5661
Maria A Shakhova1 Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation.
Marina A Sirotkina1 Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation.
Andrey V Shakhov1 Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation.
Nadezhda P Pavlova1 Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation.
Ludmila B Snopova1 Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation.
Vladimir I Bredikhin2 Institute of Applied Physics Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation.
Vladislav A Kamensky2 Institute of Applied Physics Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring the complete removal of tumor tissue is the main challenge during resection operations. Recently, a technique of "indirect" contact laser surgery has been developed. In this study we assess the possibility of using such surgery for fluorescence image-guided tumor resection. Mouse colon adenocarcinoma CT-26 cells stably expressing the fluorescent protein mKate-2 was used as the tumor model. Resections of the tumor nodes were performed with either a scalpel blade, a laser scalpel with a bare tip, or a laser scalpel with a strongly absorbing coating on the fiber tip. Tumor-positive resection margins were detected using an IVIS Spectrum fluorescence imaging system. After tumor resection with the scalpel blade over half of the animals needed one additional resection to remove residual tumor cells. Animals in this group showed tumor recurrence within 7 days. Fluorescence imaging of the tumor bed, performed after resection to assess the presence of tumor cell clusters, was sufficiently effective only with a bloodless resection. The laser scalpels both with the bare tip and with the strongly absorbing coating on the tip provided such bloodless tumor resection in contact mode. Fewer animals required additional resections when the bare tipped scalpel was used and this also resulted in a reduction in tumor recurrence. After resections were carried out with the laser scalpel with the strongly absorbing coating on the tip, fluorescence was detected in the operative field and this led to undertaking additional resections, although subsequent investigation suggested that this was "false" fluorescence, resulting from the effects of the scalpel rather than the presence of residual tumor cells. The method of laser resection with a strongly absorbing coating on the tip therefore did not appear to demonstrate definite advantages over laser resection with a bare tip when removing tumors.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyOptical ImagingSurgery, Computer-AssistedAnimalsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalHumansImmunohistochemistryMiceNeoplasmsRecurrenceTreatment Outcomefluorescence imagingindirect laser surgerylaser scalpelstrongly absorbing coatingtumor

Identifiers

PMID30343643
PMCPMC6198398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.