Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30343483›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Qualitative analysis of community pharmacists' opinions on their involvement in reducing potentially inappropriate prescribing.

Christina Raae Hansen, Stephen Byrne, Denis O'Mahony, Patricia M Kearney, Laura J Sahm

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina Raae HansenPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Cavanagh Pharmacy Building Room UG06, University College Cork, College Road Cork, Cork, Ireland. christina.raaehansen@ucc.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7205-791X
Stephen ByrnePharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Cavanagh Pharmacy Building Room UG06, University College Cork, College Road Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Denis O'MahonyDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building Room 2.59, Western Road, Cork, Ireland.
Patricia M KearneySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building 4th Floor, Western Road, Cork, Ireland.
Laura J SahmPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Cavanagh Pharmacy Building Room UG06, University College Cork, College Road Cork, Cork, Ireland.
University College Cork · IEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOlder people are at risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) due to polypharmacy arising from multi-morbidity. Despite available explicit criteria to reduce PIP, it is highly prevalent. Whilst community pharmacists have the required knowledge to help reduce PIP, they are not currently engaged with the problem. This study explores the views of community pharmacists on their potential involvement in reducing PIP and determines the challenges to its implementation.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with pharmacists working in community pharmacies in Ireland. The theoretical domains framework (TDF) was used to develop the topic guide and to analyse the transcripts. Domains of highest relevance for PIP reduction were identified based on their frequency or whether the participants emphasised the impact of constructs within a domain. Local ethical approval was obtained.

resultsOf 18 participants, 12 were female, median age was 30 years (IQR, 27-35) with a median of 6 years (IQR, 3-8) of experience. Seven TDF domains were identified as relevant to PIP reduction. Pharmacists were uncertain about their role in reducing PIP and reluctant to challenge physicians' prescribing decisions. Challenges pertained to the environment, knowledge, social influences, professional role and identity.

conclusionsPharmacists welcomed new responsibilities in reducing PIP as part of their daily practice but expressed a need for removal of social and environmental barriers as well as, provision of relevant guidelines and education about PIP. This study provides useful insights into the target domains for overcoming barriers of pharmacist involvement in reducing PIP.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingIrelandMalePharmacistsPolypharmacyProfessional RoleQualitative ResearchOlder patientsPharmacistPrescribingPrimary careQualitative

Identifiers

PMID30343483
OpenAlexW2896691693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.