Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30343467›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2019

Anti-GAD Antibodies and the Cerebellum: Where Do We Stand?

Mario Manto, Hiroshi Mitoma, Christiane S Hampe

Open access · hybridAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Anti-GAD associated post-infectious cerebellitis after COVID-19 infection.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Neurological Syndromes Associated with Anti-GAD Antibodies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cerebellar ataxia associated with anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies: a case report.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mario MantoService de Neurologie, Médiathèque Jean Jacquy, CHU-Charleroi, 6000, Charleroi, Belgium.
Hiroshi MitomaMedical Education Promotion Center, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. mitoma@tokyo-med.ac.jp.
Christiane S HampeUniversity of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Grand Charleroi Hospital · BETokyo Medical University · JPUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-GAD65 antibodies (anti-GAD65 Abs) are associated with cerebellar ataxia (CA). The significance of anti-GAD65 Abs has been a focus of debates. Since GAD65 is intracellularly located and associated with type 1 diabetes mellitus and different clinical neurological phenotypes such as CA, stiff-person syndrome, and epilepsy, some researchers have argued that anti-GAD65 Abs have no pathogenic roles. On the other hand, recent physiological studies in vitro and in vivo have elucidated that binding of GAD65 by anti-GAD65 Abs elicits loss of GAD65 functions pertaining GABA release with an epitope dependence, leading to the development of CA. Internalization of autoantibodies has been also clarified. These studies provide substantial evidence of the pathogenesis of anti-GAD65 Abs in CA. We also discuss methodological problems in the identification of anti-GAD65 Abs.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesCerebellar AtaxiaCerebellumGlutamate DecarboxylaseHumansAutoantibodiesGlutamate DecarboxylaseAnti-GAD65 antibodiesCerebellar ataxiaCerebellumGlutamic acid decarboxylase 65

Identifiers

PMID30343467
PMCPMC6443918
OpenAlexW2896682713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.