Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30343455›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2019

A randomized trial of interpersonal psychotherapy, problem solving therapy, and supportive therapy for major depressive disorder in women with breast cancer.

Carlos Blanco, John C Markowitz, David J Hellerstein, Arthur M Nezu, Melanie Wall, Mark Olfson, Ying Chen, Jon Levenson, Maika Onishi, Cindy Varona and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04973930 (Pilot Randomized Feasibility Trial of Tele-Interpersonal Psychotherapy and Tele-Pharmacotherapy for Depression in Patients With Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04973930 phase3suspendednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Randomized Feasibility Trial of Tele-Interpersonal Psychotherapy and Tele-Pharmacotherapy for Depression in Patients With Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York State Psychiatric InstituteRan2022 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsMajor Depressive Disorder, Breast Cancer, VenlafaxineArmsInterpersonal Psychotherapy, Venlafaxine HCl ER
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Influencing factors of depressive symptoms in patients with malignant tumour.The Journal of international medical research · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos BlancoDivision of Epidemiology, Services, and Prevention Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. Carlos.blanco2@nih.gov.
John C MarkowitzDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
David J HellersteinDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Arthur M NezuDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Melanie WallDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Mark OlfsonDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Ying ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Jon LevensonDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Maika OnishiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sunnyvale, CA, 94086, USA.
Cindy VaronaDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Mayumi OkudaDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Dawn L HershmanCancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Columbia University · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USDrexel University · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · US

Funding

Interpersonal therapy for depression in Breast CancerR01CA133050 · NCI · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI MARKOWITZ, JOHN C · 2009 to 2013
$2.6M
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute CA133050Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DA999999NCI NIH HHS R01 CA133050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer (BC) is a risk factor for major depressive disorder (MDD), yet little research has tested the efficacy of different psychotherapies for depressed women with BC. This study, the largest to date, compared outcomes of three evidence-based, 12-week therapies in treating major depressive disorder among women with breast cancer.

methodsThis randomized trial compared interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), problem solving therapy (PST), and brief supportive psychotherapy (BSP). Conducted at the outpatient clinic of the New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University, the trial offered bilingual treatment by treatment-specific psychotherapists supervised by treatment experts. The primary outcome was change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included other validated patient-reported outcomes for depression and quality of life.

resultsOf 179 women with breast cancer screening positive for depression at the Columbia Cancer Center, 134 eligible patients signed informed treatment consent. Half of patients were Hispanic and economically disadvantaged. Most women had stage I (35.2%) or II (36.9%) BC; 9% had stage IV. The three brief psychotherapies showed similar improvements on the HAM-D, with large pre-post effect sizes (d ~ 1.0); a priori defined response rates were 35% for IPT, 50% for PST and 31% for BSP, and remission rates 25%, 30% and 27%, respectively. The three treatments also showed similar improvements in the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire. Dropout was high, ranging from 37 to 52% across treatments. Predictors of dropout included having < 16 years of education and annual family income < $20,000.

conclusionsAmong patients who completed treatment, all three psychotherapies were associated with similar, meaningful improvements in depression. Physical distance between the oncology and psychiatric treatment sites might have contributed to high dropout. This study suggests various psychotherapy approaches may benefit patients with breast cancer and major depression.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotherapyTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerBrief supportive psychotherapy (BSP)ComorbidityInterpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)Major depressive disorderProblem solving therapy (PST)PsychotherapyRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID30343455
PMCPMC6391220
OpenAlexW2896718116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.