Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30343431›Full record

ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2018

A comparative analysis of gut microbiota disturbances in the Gottingen minipig and rhesus macaque models of acute radiation syndrome following bioequivalent radiation exposures.

Franck Carbonero, Alba C Mayta-Apaza, Jiang-Zhou Yu, Matt Lindeblad, Alex Lyubimov, Flavia Neri, Erzsebet Szilagyi, Amelia Bartholomew

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A Minireview on Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Radiosusceptibility.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Franck CarboneroDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR, 72704, USA. fgcarbon@uark.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3389-3725
Alba C Mayta-ApazaDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR, 72704, USA.
Jiang-Zhou YuDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA.
Matt LindebladDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA.
Alex LyubimovDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA.
Flavia NeriDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA.
Erzsebet SzilagyiDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA.
Amelia BartholomewDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA.

Funding

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases NIH-NIAID-DAIT-05-037U.S. Department of Health and Human Services HHS0100201100014I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In rodent studies, the gut microbiota has been implicated in facilitating both radioresistance, by protecting the epithelium from apoptotic responses and radiosensitivity, inducing endothelial apoptotic responses. Despite the observation that large animal models, such as the Chinese Rhesus macaque and the Gottingen Minipig, demonstrate similarity to human physiologic responses to radiation, little is known about radiation-induced changes of the gut microbiome in these models. To compare the two models, we used bioequivalent radiation doses which resulted in an LD50 for Gottingen Minipigs and Chinese Rhesus macaques, 1.9 Gy and 6.8 Gy, respectively. Fecal samples taken prior and 3 days post-radiation were used for 16S rRNA gene sequence amplicon high throughput sequencing (Illumina MiSeq). Baseline gut microbiota profiles were dissimilar between minipigs and rhesus macaques. Irradiation profoundly impacted gut microbiota profiles in both animals. Significant increases of intracellular symbionts were common to both models and to reported changes in rodents suggesting universality of these findings post-radiation. Remarkably, opposite dynamics were observed for the main phyla, with increase of Firmicutes and decrease of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria in minipigs but with enrichment of Bacteroidetes in rhesus macaques. Minipig changes in magnitude and in variety of species affected were more extensive than those observed in rhesus macaques. This pilot study provides an important first step in comparing the radiosensitive pig model to the comparatively more radioresistant macaque model, for the identification of microbial elements which may influence radiosensitivity.

Indexed as

Acute Radiation SyndromeAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGastrointestinal MicrobiomeKaplan-Meier EstimateMacaca mulattaRadiation ExposureSwineSwine, MiniatureTherapeutic EquivalencyAcute Radiation SyndromeGottingen minipigsGut microbiotaLD50Rhesus macaques

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.