ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018
Risk Factor in Endodontic Treatment: Topographic Evaluation of Mandibular Posterior Teeth and Lingual Cortical Plate Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CT).
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topographic Evaluation of Inflammatory Periapical Lesions in the First Molar's Region Using CBCT.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Risk factors for impacted lower third molar root perforation through the undercut-shaped lingual plate: preoperative insights from panoramic radiography.Odontology · 2024Article
- Quantitative and Qualitative Correlation of Mandibular Lingual Bone with Risk Factors for Third Molar Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2023Article
- Risk factors for lingual plate fracture during mandibular third molar extraction.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Article
- Prosthetically driven immediate implant placement at lower molar area; an anatomical study.European oral research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Topographic relationships of mandibular posterior teeth with mandibular cortical plate are extremely important both in terms of infection spread and endodontic and surgical procedures to be performed. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between root apex of the mandibular posterior teeth and lingual plate of the mandible. MATERIAL AND METHODS CBCT data of 138 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The topographic relationship between root apex and lingual plate was classified as non-contact, contact, or perforation. Morphology of the mandibular lingual plate was classified into the 4 types (convex, parallel, undercut, slanted) and recorded for each tooth region. The prevalence of each group was calculated. RESULTS In 6.2% of all mandibular posterior teeth, the lingual plate was perforated by at least 1 root of the corresponding tooth. The teeth with the highest perforation rate were the third molar tooth (31.6%) and the second molar tooth (14.7%). The most common mandibular lingual plate morphology type was "undercut type" (61.3%) in the molar teeth region, while "parallel type" (55.7%) was most common in the premolar teeth region. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, a high percentage of mandibular second and third molars root apex have topographically close relationships to the lingual plate of the mandible. Hence, endodontic consultants must be aware by this anatomical relationship and be aware of possible complications during endodontic and surgical procedures using radiographical modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.