Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30343250›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018

Using fMRI and machine learning to predict symptom improvement following cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis.

Eva Tolmeijer, Veena Kumari, Emmanuelle Peters, Steven C R Williams, Liam Mason

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The promise of machine learning in predicting treatment outcomes in psychiatry.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neuroscience-Informed Treatments.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eva TolmeijerDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK. Electronic address: eva.1.tolmeijer@kcl.ac.uk.
Veena KumariDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, College of Life and Health Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Emmanuelle PetersDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK; PICuP (Psychological Interventions Clinic for outpatients with Psychosis), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Steven C R WilliamsDepartment of Neuroimaging, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Liam MasonDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK; PICuP (Psychological Interventions Clinic for outpatients with Psychosis), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK; University College London, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, London, UK; University College London, Max Planck Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London UK.
King's College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 067427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp) involves helping patients to understand and reframe threatening appraisals of their psychotic experiences to reduce distress and increase functioning. Whilst CBTp is effective for many, it is not effective for all patients and the factors predicting a good outcome remain poorly understood. Machine learning is a powerful approach that allows new predictors to be identified in a data-driven way, which can inform understanding of the mechanisms underlying therapeutic interventions, and ultimately make predictions about symptom improvement at the individual patient level. Thirty-eight patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia completed a social affect task during functional MRI. Multivariate pattern analysis assessed whether treatment response in those receiving CBTp (n = 22) could be predicted by pre-therapy neural responses to facial affect that was either threat-related (ambiguous 'neutral' faces perceived as threatening in psychosis, in addition to angry and fearful faces) or prosocial (happy faces). The models predicted improvement in psychotic (r = 0.63, p = 0.003) and affective (r = 0.31, p = 0.05) symptoms following CBTp, but not in the treatment-as-usual group (n = 16). Psychotic symptom improvement was predicted by neural responses to threat-related affect across sensorimotor and frontal-limbic regions, whereas affective symptom improvement was predicted by neural responses to fearful faces only as well as prosocial affect across sensorimotor and frontal regions. These findings suggest that CBTp most likely improves psychotic and affective symptoms in those endorsing more threatening appraisals and mood-congruent processing biases, respectively, which are explored and reframed as part of the therapy. This study improves our understanding of the neurobiology of treatment response and provides a foundation that will hopefully lead to greater precision and tailoring of the interventions offered to patients.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaTreatment OutcomeAffective processingCognitive behavioural therapyDepressive symptomsNeuroimagingPositive psychotic symptomsSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID30343250
PMCPMC6197386
OpenAlexW2896060363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.