Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30342908›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2019

Between-Race Differences in Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Before and After Breast Density Notification Law.

Mark Manning, Terrance L Albrecht, Suzanne O'Neill, Kristen Purrington

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark ManningKarmanos Cancer Institutes; Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan. Electronic address: manningm@karmanos.org.
Terrance L AlbrechtKarmanos Cancer Institutes; Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Suzanne O'NeillLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Kristen PurringtonKarmanos Cancer Institutes; Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Wayne State University · USGeorgetown University · USThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie Lynn Boerner · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines recommend supplemental breast cancer screening for women at increased breast cancer risk; however, the passage of breast density notification laws may lead to supplemental screening that is incongruent with women's risk. We examined supplemental screening (ie, MRI, ultrasound, or tomosynthesis within 6 months of screening mammogram) among a sample of 2,764 African American (AA) and 691 European American (EA) women with negative or benign screening mammograms for whom we had data from both before and after implementation of breast density notification laws in the state of Michigan. Results indicated a 5-fold increase (from 0.14% to 0.7% of women) in supplemental screening among screen-negative women after passage of the law, driven in large part by an increase in supplemental screening among AA women. Breast density was more predictive of supplemental screening and had a marginally greater explanatory role in between-race differences in supplemental screening after passage of the law. Subgroup analyses (n = 250) indicated that whereas 5-year breast cancer risk was positively associated with supplemental screening before the law and negatively associated after the law for EA women, 5-year risk was not associated with supplemental screening either before or after passage of the law for AA women. Our findings suggest that whereas passage of the breast density notification laws may have motivated supplemental screening among AA women in particular, it lessened the consideration of breast cancer risk in supplemental screening decision making.

Indexed as

AdultBlack or African AmericanBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsCancer Care FacilitiesCell Transformation, NeoplasticDatabases, FactualEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceMammographyMass ScreeningMichiganMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAfrican Americansbetween-race differencesBreast density notificationsupplemental breast cancer screening

Identifiers

PMID30342908
PMCPMC6816015
OpenAlexW2896760459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.