Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30342633›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of preventive medicine2018

Impact of Contraceptive Education on Knowledge and Decision Making: An Updated Systematic Review.

Karen Pazol, Lauren B Zapata, Christine Dehlendorf, Nikita M Malcolm, Rachel B Rosmarin, Brittni N Frederiksen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of preventive medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen PazolDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: kpazol@cdc.gov.
Lauren B ZapataDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Christine DehlendorfDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California; Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, California; Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, SanFrancisco, California.
Nikita M MalcolmAtlas Research, Washington, District of Columbia.
Rachel B RosmarinAtlas Research, Washington, District of Columbia.
Brittni N FrederiksenOffice of Population Affairs, HHS, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextEducational interventions can help individuals increase their knowledge of available contraceptive methods, enabling them to make informed decisions and use contraception correctly. This review updates a previous review of contraceptive education. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Multiple databases were searched for articles published March 2011-November 2016. Primary outcomes were knowledge, participation in and satisfaction/comfort with decision making, attitudes toward contraception, and selection of more effective methods. Secondary outcomes included contraceptive behaviors and pregnancy. Excluded articles described interventions that had no comparison group, could not be conducted feasibly in a clinic setting, or were conducted outside the U.S. or similar country. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 24,953 articles were identified. Combined with the original review, 37 articles met inclusion criteria and described 31 studies implementing a range of educational approaches (interactive tools, written materials, audio/videotapes, and text messages), with and without healthcare provider feedback, for a total of 36 independent interventions. Of the 31 interventions for which knowledge was assessed, 28 had a positive effect. Fewer were assessed for their effect on attitudes toward contraception, selection of more effective methods, contraceptive behaviors, or pregnancy-although increased knowledge was found to mediate additional outcomes (positive attitudes toward contraception and contraceptive continuation).

conclusionsThis systematic review is consistent with evidence from the broader healthcare field in suggesting that a range of interventions can increase knowledge. Future studies should assess what aspects are most effective, the benefits of including provider feedback, and the extent to which educational interventions can facilitate behavior change and attainment of reproductive health goals. THEME INFORMATION: This article is part of a theme issue entitled Updating the Systematic Reviews Used to Develop the U.S. Recommendations for Providing Quality Family Planning Services, which is sponsored by the Office of Population Affairs, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Indexed as

ContraceptionDecision MakingFamily Planning ServicesHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Contraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsHumansUnited StatesUnited States Dept. of Health and Human ServicesContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID30342633
PMCPMC10521032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.