Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30342632›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of preventive medicine2018

Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review.

Edith Fox, Arlene Reyna, Nikita M Malcolm, Rachel B Rosmarin, Lauren B Zapata, Brittni N Frederiksen, Susan B Moskosky, Christine Dehlendorf

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of preventive medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07075536 (A Web-based Contraceptive Decision Support Tool for Individuals With Health Conditions), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07075536 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Web-based Contraceptive Decision Support Tool for Individuals With Health Conditions: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial With Mixed Methods

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2025 to 2028Enrolled795ConditionsContraceptive Usage, Contraceptive Behavior, Chronic Disease, Chronic ConditionArmsMy Health, My Choice Web-Based Contraceptive Decision Tool, Usual Contraceptive Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edith FoxDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: edith.fox@ucsf.edu.
Arlene ReynaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Nikita M MalcolmAtlas Research, Washington, District of Columbia.
Rachel B RosmarinAtlas Research, Washington, District of Columbia.
Lauren B ZapataDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Brittni N FrederiksenOffice of Population Affairs, HHS, Washington, District of Columbia.
Susan B MoskoskyOffice of Population Affairs, HHS, Washington, District of Columbia.
Christine DehlendorfDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California,San Francisco, California; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
University of California, San Francisco · USOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Health · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextProviders can help clients achieve their personal reproductive goals by providing high-quality, client-centered contraceptive counseling. Given the individualized nature of contraceptive decision making, provider attention to clients' preferences for counseling interactions can enhance client centeredness. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence on what preferences clients have for the contraceptive counseling they receive. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This systematic review is part of an update to a prior review series to inform contraceptive counseling in clinical settings. Sixteen electronic bibliographic databases were searched for studies related to client preferences for contraceptive counseling published in the U.S. or similar settings from March 2011 through November 2016. Because studies on client preferences were not included in the prior review series, a limited search was conducted for earlier research published from October 1992 through February 2011. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: In total, 26 articles met inclusion criteria, including 17 from the search of literature published March 2011 or later and nine from the search of literature from October 1992 through February 2011. Nineteen articles included results about client preferences for information received during counseling, 13 articles included results about preferences for the decision-making process, 13 articles included results about preferences for the relationship between providers and clients, and 11 articles included results about preferences for the context in which contraceptive counseling is delivered.

conclusionsEvidence from the mostly small, qualitative studies included in this review describes preferences for the contraceptive counseling interaction. Provider attention to these preferences may improve the quality of family planning care; future research is needed to explore interventions designed to meet preferences. THEME INFORMATION: This article is part of a theme issue entitled Updating the Systematic Reviews Used to Develop the U.S. Recommendations for Providing Quality Family Planning Services, which is sponsored by the Office of Population Affairs, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Indexed as

ContraceptionCounselingFamily Planning ServicesPatient PreferenceHumansUnited StatesUnited States Dept. of Health and Human Services

Identifiers

PMID30342632
PMCPMC6655529
OpenAlexW2896904133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.