Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30342631›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of preventive medicine2018

Contraceptive Counseling in Clinical Settings: An Updated Systematic Review.

Lauren B Zapata, Karen Pazol, Christine Dehlendorf, Kathryn M Curtis, Nikita M Malcolm, Rachel B Rosmarin, Brittni N Frederiksen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of preventive medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2022.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2021.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2023
    Article
  12. The Effects of Hormonal and Non-Hormonal Intrauterine Devices on Female Sexual Function: A Systematic Review.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren B ZapataDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: lzapata@cdc.gov.
Karen PazolDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Christine DehlendorfDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Kathryn M CurtisDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Nikita M MalcolmAtlas Research, Washington, District of Columbia.
Rachel B RosmarinAtlas Research, Washington, District of Columbia.
Brittni N FrederiksenOffice of Population Affairs, HHS, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe objective of this systematic review was to update a prior review and summarize the evidence (newly identified and cumulative) on the impact of contraceptive counseling provided in clinical settings. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Multiple databases, including PubMed, were searched during 2016-2017 for articles published from March 1, 2011, to November 30, 2016. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The search strategy identified 24,953 articles; ten studies met inclusion criteria. Two of three new studies that examined contraceptive counseling interventions (i.e., enhanced models to standard of care) among adolescents and young adults found a statistically significant positive impact on at least one outcome of interest. Five of seven new studies that examined contraceptive counseling, in general, or specific counseling interventions or aspects of counseling (e.g., personalization) among adults or mixed populations (adults and adolescents) found a statistically significant positive impact on at least one outcome of interest. In combination with the initial review, six of nine studies among adolescents and young adults and 16 of 23 studies among adults or mixed populations found a statistically significant positive impact of counseling on at least one outcome of interest.

conclusionsOverall, evidence supports the utility of contraceptive counseling, in general, and specific interventions or aspects of counseling. Promising components of contraceptive counseling were identified. The following would strengthen the evidence base: improved documentation of counseling content and processes, increased attention to the relationships between client experiences and behavioral outcomes, and examining the comparative effectiveness of different counseling approaches to identify those that are most effective. THEME INFORMATION: This article is part of a theme issue entitled Updating the Systematic Reviews Used to Develop the U.S. Recommendations for Providing Quality Family Planning Services, which is sponsored by the Office of Population Affairs, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Indexed as

ContraceptionCounselingAdolescentFamily Planning ServicesHumansUnited StatesUnited States Dept. of Health and Human ServicesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30342631
PMCPMC6613590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.