Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30342242›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pain and symptom management2019

Triggered Palliative Care for Late-Stage Dementia: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Laura C Hanson, Christine E Kistler, Kyle Lavin, Stacey L Gabriel, Natalie C Ernecoff, Feng-Chang Lin, Greg A Sachs, Susan L Mitchell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Family Caregivers' Perspectives on Challenges and Support Needs in Hospital-Based Palliative Care for Persons Living With Dementia.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura C HansonDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care Program, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: lhanson@med.unc.edu.
Christine E KistlerDepartment of Family Medicine and Palliative Care Program, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Kyle LavinDepartment of Psychiatry and Palliative Care Program, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Stacey L GabrielCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Natalie C ErnecoffDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Feng-Chang LinDepartment of Biostatistics, Gillings Global School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Greg A SachsDivision of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Susan L MitchellHebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research and Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USRegenstrief Institute · US

Funding

Triggered Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia: A Pilot StudyR21AG052140 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HANSON, LAURA C · 2016 to 2017
$418k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG052140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPersons with late-stage dementia have limited access to palliative care.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to test dementia-specific specialty palliative care triggered by hospitalization.

methodsThis pilot randomized controlled trial enrolled 62 dyads of persons with late-stage dementia and family decision-makers on admission to hospital. Intervention dyads received dementia-specific specialty palliative care consultation plus postacute transitional care. Control dyads received usual care and educational information. The primary outcome was 60-day hospital or emergency department visits. Secondary patient- and family-centered outcomes were patient comfort, family distress, palliative care domains addressed in the treatment plan, and access to hospice or community-based palliative care. Secondary decision-making outcomes were discussion of prognosis, goals of care, completion of Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST), and treatment decisions.

resultsOf 137 eligible dyads, 62 (45%) were enrolled. The intervention proved feasible, with protocol completion ranging from 77% (family two-week call) to 93% (initial consultation). Hospital and emergency department visits did not differ (intervention vs. control, 0.68 vs. 0.53 transfers per 60 days, P = 0.415). Intervention patients had more palliative care domains addressed and were more likely to receive hospice (25% vs. 3%, P < 0.019). Intervention families were more likely to discuss prognosis (90% vs. 3%, P < 0.001) and goals of care (90% vs. 25%, P < 0.001) and to have a MOST at 60-day follow-up (79% vs. 30%, P < 0.001). More intervention families made decisions to avoid rehospitalization (13% vs. 0%, P = 0.033).

conclusionSpecialty palliative care consultation for hospitalized patients with late-stage dementia is feasible and promising to improve decision-making and some treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

HospitalizationPalliative CareAcute DiseaseAged, 80 and overDecision MakingDementiaFamilyFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth CommunicationHumansMalePatient-Centered CarePilot ProjectsQuality of Health CareDementiapalliative carerandomized trial

Identifiers

PMID30342242
PMCPMC6310628
OpenAlexW2897134714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.