Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30342199›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2018

Absence of Neuronal Response Modulation with Familiarity in Perirhinal Cortex.

Liad J Baruchin, Adam Ranson, Mark Good, Vincenzo Crunelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liad J BaruchinNeuroscience Division, School of Bioscience, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Electronic address: liad.baruchin@dpag.ox.ac.uk.
Adam RansonNeurosciences & Mental Health Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, UK.
Mark GoodDepartment of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Vincenzo CrunelliNeuroscience Division, School of Bioscience, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Malta University, Msida, Malta. Electronic address: crunelli@cardiff.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 91882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perirhinal cortex (PRH) is considered a crucial cortical area for familiarity memory and electrophysiological studies have reported the presence of visual familiarity encoding neurons in PRH. However, recent evidence has questioned the existence of these neurons. Here, we used a visual task in which head-restrained mice were passively exposed to oriented gratings or natural images. Evoked potentials and single-unit recordings showed evoked responses to novelty in V1 under some conditions. However, the PRH showed no response modulation with respect to familiarity under a variety of different conditions or retention delays. These results indicate that the PRH does not contribute to familiarity/novelty encoding using passively exposed visual stimuli.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiscrimination, PsychologicalEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleMaleMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsPattern Recognition, VisualPerirhinal CortexPhotic StimulationRecognition, PsychologyVisual Cortexensemble recordingsmedial temporal lobememoryvisual evoked potentials

Identifiers

PMID30342199
PMCPMC6280024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.