Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30342066›Full record

Trial reportAppetite2019

Episodic future thinking and grocery shopping online.

Kelseanna Hollis-Hansen, Jennifer Seidman, Sara O'Donnell, Leonard H Epstein

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Appetite, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
27.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. An ecological momentary episodic future thinking intervention on mother's weekly food purchases.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelseanna Hollis-HansenDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, USA. Electronic address: Kasmith6@buffalo.edu.
Jennifer SeidmanDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, USA.
Sara O'DonnellDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, USA.
Leonard H EpsteinDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, USA.
Jacobs (United States) · US

Funding

Using prospection to improve obesity treatmentR01HD080292 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD080292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grocery shopping shapes the home food environment, which can contribute to the development of obesity. Episodic future thinking (EFT) helps adults make healthier decisions by initiating prospective thinking, which guides one to forego smaller immediate rewards in favor of larger delayed rewards. EFT could help parents improve grocery purchases thereby improving the home food environment and family eating behaviors. The effect of EFT on food shopping was evaluated in two studies with mothers who were overweight/obese and primary household shoppers. In Study 1, 24 mothers were randomized to goal-directed process EFT versus a money saving control. In Study 2, 33 mothers were randomized to goal-directed process EFT, general EFT, or an episodic recent thinking (ERT) control. Following cue generation, participants completed a task where they purchased one week of groceries from an online store. Food purchases were analyzed for calories purchased per family member. In Study 1 the goal-directed process EFT group purchased fewer calories per person (F(1, 23) = 25.16, p < .001; η

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorDecision MakingThinkingAdultEnergy IntakeFemaleFoodGoalsHumansMiddle AgedMothersObesityOverweightReward

Identifiers

PMID30342066
PMCPMC6312505
OpenAlexW2896733528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.