Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30342028›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2019

Increasing prevalence of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma on index endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus over the past 2 decades: data from a multicenter U.S. consortium.

Madhav Desai, David A Lieberman, Kevin F Kennedy, Nour Hamade, Prashanthi Thota, Sravanthi Parasa, Venkat Subhash Gorrepati, Ajay Bansal, Neil Gupta, Srinivas Gaddam and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Magnitude and Time-Trend Analysis of Postendoscopy Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Advances in the Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Biomarker Use in Barrett's Esophagus Surveillance.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neoplastic Progression of Barrett's Esophagus Among Organ Transplant Recipients: a Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Madhav DesaiGastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
David A LiebermanGastroenterology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Kevin F KennedyGastroenterology, VA Medical Center Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Nour HamadeGastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Prashanthi ThotaGastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Sravanthi ParasaGastroenterology, Swedish Medical Group, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Venkat Subhash GorrepatiGastroenterology, VA Medical Center Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Ajay BansalGastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Neil GuptaGastroenterology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Srinivas GaddamGastroenterology, Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Patrick E YoungGastroenterology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Sharad MathurPathology, VA Medical Center Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Fouad J MoawadGastroenterology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Brooks D CashGastroenterology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA.
Richard SamplinerGastroenterology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
John J VargoGastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Gary W FalkGastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Prateek SharmaGastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA; Gastroenterology, VA Medical Center Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Kansas City VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USLoyola University Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USSwedish Medical Center · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of South Alabama · US

Funding

Whole Exome Approaches for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Susceptibility GenesU54CA163060 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAK, AMITABH, GUDA, KISHORE · 2011 to 2022
$14.0M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionData on time trends of dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) during the index endoscopy (ie, prevalent cases) are limited. Our aim was to determine the prevalence patterns of BE-associated dysplasia on index endoscopy over the past 25 years.

methodsThe Barrett's Esophagus Study is a multicenter outcome project of a large cohort of patients with BE. Proportions of patients with index endoscopy findings of no dysplasia (NDBE), low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and EAC were extracted per year of index endoscopy, and 5-yearly patient cohorts were tabulated over years 1990 to 2010+ (2010-current). Prevalent dysplasia and endoscopic findings were trended over the past 25 years using percentage dysplasia (LGD, HGD, EAC, and HGD/EAC) to assess changes in detection of BE-associated dysplasia over the last 25 years. Statistical analysis was done using SAS version 9.4 software (SAS, Cary, NC).

resultsA total of 3643 patients were included in the analysis with index endoscopy showing NDBE in 2513 (70.1%), LGD in 412 (11.5%), HGD in 193 (5.4%), and EAC in 181 (5.1%). Over time, there was an increase in the mean age of patients with BE (51.7 ± 29 years vs 62.6 ± 11.3 years) and the proportion of males (84% vs 92.6%) diagnosed with BE but a decrease in the mean BE length (4.4±4.3 cm vs 2.9±3.0 cm) as time progressed (1990-1994 to 2010-2016 time periods). The presence of LGD on index endoscopy remained stable over 1990 to 2016. However, a significant increase (148% in HGD and 112% in EAC) in the diagnosis of HGD, EAC, and HGD/EAC was noted on index endoscopy over the last 25 years (P < .001). There was also a significant increase in the detection of visible lesions on index endoscopy (1990-1994, 5.1%; to 2005-2009, 6.3%; and 2010+, 16.3%) during the same period.

conclusionOur results suggest that the prevalence of HGD and EAC has significantly increased over the past 25 years despite a decrease in BE length during the same period. This increase parallels an increase in the detection of visible lesions, suggesting that a careful examination at the index examination is crucial.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedBarrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm GradingOdds RatioPopulation GrowthPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID30342028
PMCPMC7053563
OpenAlexW2896212447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.