Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30341719›Full record

ArticleTranslational stroke research2019

Preconditioning in the Rhesus Macaque Induces a Proteomic Signature Following Cerebral Ischemia that Is Associated with Neuroprotection.

Susan L Stevens, Tao Liu, Frances Rena Bahjat, Vladislav A Petyuk, Athena A Schepmoes, Ryan L Sontag, Marina A Gritsenko, Chaochao Wu, Sheng Wang, Anil K Shukla and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational stroke research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Susan L StevensDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Tao LiuBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Frances Rena BahjatDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Vladislav A PetyukBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Athena A SchepmoesBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Ryan L SontagBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Marina A GritsenkoBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Chaochao WuBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Sheng WangBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Anil K ShuklaBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Jon M JacobsBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Richard D SmithBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Karin D RodlandBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
G Alexander WestHouston Methodist Neurosurgery, Houston, TX, USA.
Steven G KohamaDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, OR, USA.
Christine GlynnDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Mary P Stenzel-PooreDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. poorem@ohsu.edu.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory · USOregon Health & Science University · USHouston Methodist · USOregon National Primate Research Center · US

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
Equipment Supplement Request for a Research Resource for Ultra-sensitive High Throughput ProteomicsP41GM103493 · NIGMS · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2012 to 2022
$22.6M
NINDS Cooperative Program in Translational ResearchU01NS064953 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI STENZEL-POORE, MARY P · 2009 to 2014
$8.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103493NIH HHS P51 OD011092NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS064953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each year, thousands of patients are at risk of cerebral ischemic injury, due to iatrogenic responses to surgical procedures. Prophylactic treatment of these patients as standard care could minimize potential neurological complications. We have shown that protection of brain tissue, in a non-human primate model of cerebral ischemic injury, is possible through pharmacological preconditioning using the immune activator D192935. We postulate that preconditioning with D192935 results in neuroprotective reprogramming that is evident in the brain following experimentally induced cerebral ischemia. We performed quantitative proteomic analysis of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) collected post-stroke from our previously published efficacy study to determine whether CSF protein profiles correlated with induced protection. Four groups of animals were examined: naïve animals (no treatment or stroke); animals treated with vehicle prior to stroke; D192935 treated and stroked animals, further delineated into two groups, ones that were protected (small infarcts) and those that were not protected (large infarcts). We found that distinct protein clusters defined the protected and non-protected animal groups, with a 16-member cluster of proteins induced exclusively in D192935 protected animals. Seventy percent of the proteins induced in the protected animals have functions that would enhance neuroprotection and tissue repair, including several members associated with M2 macrophages, a macrophage phenotype shown to contribute to neuroprotection and repair during ischemic injury. These studies highlight the translational importance of CSF biomarkers in defining mechanism and monitoring responses to treatment in development of stroke therapeutics.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain IschemiaIschemic PreconditioningMacaca mulattaMaleNeuroprotectionProteomicsToll-Like Receptor 9Toll-Like Receptor 9Cerebral spinal fluidNeuroprotectionNon-human primatesProteomicsStroke

Identifiers

PMID30341719
PMCPMC6474839
OpenAlexW2896823554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.