Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30341718›Full record

ArticleTranslational stroke research2019

Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles for Stroke: Biodistribution and MicroRNA Study.

Gyeong Joon Moon, Ji Hee Sung, Dong Hee Kim, Eun Hee Kim, Yeon Hee Cho, Jeong Pyo Son, Jae Min Cha, Oh Young Bang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Translational stroke research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pleiotropic Effects of Exosomes as a Therapy for Stroke Recovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gyeong Joon MoonTranslational and Stem Cell Research Laboratory on Stroke, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Ji Hee SungTranslational and Stem Cell Research Laboratory on Stroke, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Dong Hee KimTranslational and Stem Cell Research Laboratory on Stroke, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Eun Hee KimTranslational and Stem Cell Research Laboratory on Stroke, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Yeon Hee ChoTranslational and Stem Cell Research Laboratory on Stroke, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Jeong Pyo SonTranslational and Stem Cell Research Laboratory on Stroke, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Jae Min Cha3D Stem Cell Bioprocessing Laboratory, Department of Mechatronics, Incheon National University, Incheon, 22012, Republic of Korea.
Oh Young BangTranslational and Stem Cell Research Laboratory on Stroke, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351, South Korea. ohyoung.bang@samsung.com.
Samsung Medical Center · KRSungkyunkwan University · KRIncheon National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exert their therapeutic capability through a variety of bioactive substances, including trophic factors, microRNAs, and extracellular vesicles (EVs) in infarcted tissues. We therefore hypothesized that MSC-derived EVs (MSC-EVs) possess therapeutic molecules similar to MSCs. Moreover, given their nature as nanosized and lipid-shielded particles, the intravenous infusion of MSC-EVs would be advantageous over MSCs as a safer therapeutic approach. In this study, we investigated the biodistribution, therapeutic efficacy, and mode of action of MSC-EVs in a rat stroke model. MSC-EVs successfully stimulated neurogenesis and angiogenesis in vivo. When compared to the MSC-treated group, rats treated with MSC-EVs exhibited greater behavioral improvements than the control group (p < 0.05). Our biodistribution study using fluorescence-labeled MSC-EVs and MSCs demonstrated that the amounts of MSC-EVs in the infarcted hemisphere increased in a dose-dependent manner, and were rarely found in the lung and liver. In addition, MSC-EVs were highly inclusive of various proteins and microRNAs (miRNAs) associated with neurogenesis and/or angiogenesis compared to fibro-EVs. We further analyzed those miRNAs and found that miRNA-184 and miRNA-210 were essential for promoting neurogenesis and angiogenesis of MSC-EVs, respectively. MSC-EVs represent an ideal alternative to MSCs for stroke treatment, with similar medicinal capacity but an improved safety profile that overcomes cell-associated limitations in stem cell therapy.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsAnimalsBrainDisease Models, AnimalExtracellular VesiclesMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMicroRNAsNeurogenesisRats, Sprague-DawleyStrokeAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsMicroRNAsAngiogenesisExtracellular vesiclesMesenchymal stem cellsMicroRNAsNeurogenesisStroke

Identifiers

PMID30341718
OpenAlexW2897643946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.