Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30341689›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2018

[Immunotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer-a comeback?]

M De Santis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M De SantisKlinik für Urologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. Maria.de-Santis@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCA) seems to be more of an immunologic desert than other tumor entities. It is striking that only rarely does prostate cancer show abundant immune cells and a proimmunogenic microenvironment.

objectivesIs immunotherapy in PCA effective and which patients can benefit. MATERIALS AND

methodsA review of the literature and recent congress data are presented.

resultsPreliminary results with sipuleucel-T for PCA cancer were very promising showing a significant overall survival benefit in randomised phase III studies and the US Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approval for this individualised vaccine. Contrary to other tumor entities this was not the immediate breakthrough to a new therapeutic era of immunotherapy but remained an isolated case and restricted to the USA. More recently, several trials evaluated immunotherapeutic agents but missed their preliminary endpoints. Interestingly, individual patients did benefit and showed long-term remission.

conclusionsGenome sequencing and new biomarkers are also paving a novel pathway towards individualised immunotherapy for PCA. On-going research and clinical trials are exploring the question of which patients will benefit.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesImmunotherapyProstatic NeoplasmsDrug ApprovalHumansMaleTumor MicroenvironmentCancer VaccinesCheckpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyPD-L1 inhibitorPembrolizumabVaccine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.