Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30341658›Full record

ReviewSurgical endoscopy2019

Concomitant ventral hernia repair and bariatric surgery: a retrospective analysis from a UK-based bariatric center.

Miss Sylvia Krivan, Andrea Giorga, Marco Barreca, Vigyan Kumar Jain, Omer Saad Al-Taan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Management of ventral hernia in patients with BMI > 30 Kg/mHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miss Sylvia KrivanUpper Gastrointestinal (UGI), Bariatric Surgery Unit, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Lewsey Road, Luton, LU4 0DZ, UK. navirk@hotmail.com.
Andrea GiorgaUpper Gastrointestinal (UGI), Bariatric Surgery Unit, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Lewsey Road, Luton, LU4 0DZ, UK.
Marco BarrecaUpper Gastrointestinal (UGI), Bariatric Surgery Unit, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Lewsey Road, Luton, LU4 0DZ, UK.
Vigyan Kumar JainUpper Gastrointestinal (UGI), Bariatric Surgery Unit, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Lewsey Road, Luton, LU4 0DZ, UK.
Omer Saad Al-TaanUpper Gastrointestinal (UGI), Bariatric Surgery Unit, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Lewsey Road, Luton, LU4 0DZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentral hernias (VH) are frequently encountered in patients with morbid obesity. Concomitant ventral hernia repair (VHR) and bariatric surgery (BS) is practiced but still controversial. Wound-related complications (seroma, hematoma, wound infection) and hernia recurrence rates are possible inhibitor factors. We aimed to estimate the rate of complications from concomitant BS (laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy) and VHR and identify patient subgroups at higher risk of complications from synchronous repair.

methodsA retrospective analysis of successive 106 patients who underwent concomitant BS + VHR at our institute (09/2007 to 09/2015) was performed using data from patients' record. Parameters considered were: type of repair (open/laparoscopic and primary closure/mesh), size and type of hernia (< 5 cm, 5-10 cm, > 10 cm and primary/incisional), patient gender and comorbidities.

resultsOne hundred and six patients underwent concomitant BS and VHR. Fifty-nine had laparoscopic VHR and 47 open. Hernias recurred in 5 (8.47%) laparoscopic and 7 (14.89%) open VHR. Wound-related complications were common in open (15%) vs. laparoscopic (11.7%) VHR. Patients with VH recurrence included 8 (75%) with defects > 5 cm, 10 (83%) female, and all had BMI > 45. Six patients had wound infection, 5 of which had type 2 diabetes mellitus. Six patients had hematoma, 5 of which underwent mesh repairs. Finally, four patients developed seroma (BMI > 48, defects > 5 cm, laparoscopic mesh repair).

conclusionSynchronous VHR and BS in a bariatric unit is feasible with low recurrence rate. Laparoscopic VHR has lower complication rates than open, apart from seroma formation. Patients with diabetes have higher risk of infection.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGastrectomyGastric BypassHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.