Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30341655›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019

Peroral endoscopic myotomy leads to higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure than laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia.

Madhusudhan R Sanaka, Prashanthi N Thota, Malav P Parikh, Umar Hayat, Niyati M Gupta, Scott Gabbard, Rocio Lopez, Sudish Murthy, Siva Raja

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. POEM, GPOEM, and ZPOEM.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Madhusudhan R SanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. sanakam@ccf.org.
Prashanthi N ThotaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Malav P ParikhDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Umar HayatDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Niyati M GuptaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Scott GabbardDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Rocio LopezDepartment of Quantitative Health Science and Bio-statistics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Sudish MurthyDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Siva RajaDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may be associated with higher rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) than laparoscopic Heller's myotomy with fundoplication (LHM), since POEM is not combined with a fundoplication. However, peri-esophageal anti-reflux barriers are preserved in POEM, which might prevent GERD. Hence, we sought to compare the objective esophageal pH study findings in achalasia patients after POEM and LHM.

methodsAchalasia patients undergoing POEM from 2014 to 2015 at our institution were matched 1:3 with LHM patients using propensity score matching. Demographics, prior interventions, pre-treatment and 2-month post-treatment timed barium esophagram (TBE), high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and 24-h esophageal pH study findings were compared between the two groups.

resultsThirty-one patients in the POEM group and 88 patients in the LHM group were included. Larger proportion of POEM patients had prior interventions for achalasia as compared to LHM patients (overall: 71% vs. 44.3%; p = 0.012). Esophageal acid exposure was significantly higher in POEM as compared to LHM patients (abnormal total acid exposure: 48.4% vs. 13.6%; p < 0.001, abnormal DeMeester score 54.8% vs. 17.4%; p = 0.005 respectively). In sub-group analysis, similar results were noted on 24-h pH study after exclusion of the POEM patients with prior LHM and corresponding matches. There was no significant difference in the rate of GERD symptoms between POEM and LHM. There was no significant correlation between the post-treatment basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and integrated relaxation pressure with abnormal acid exposure in either POEM or LHM.

conclusionsIn patients with achalasia, POEM leads to significantly higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure, without an increase in the rate of GERD symptoms, when compared to LHM with fundoplication. Interestingly, prior LHM has no impact on post-POEM pH study findings. Potential of increased esophageal acid exposure and possible consequences should be discussed with all patients prior to POEM. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of increased acid exposure after POEM.

Indexed as

AdultEsophageal AchalasiaEsophageal Sphincter, LowerEsophagoscopyFemaleFundoplicationGastroesophageal RefluxHeller MyotomyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedMyotomyNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryAchalasiaGastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD)Heller’s myotomyPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)pH study

Identifiers

PMID30341655
OpenAlexW2898011226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.