Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30341593›Full record

Trial reportSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

Adaptations to Concurrent Training in Combination with High Protein Availability: A Comparative Trial in Healthy, Recreationally Active Men.

Baubak Shamim, Brooke L Devlin, Ryan G Timmins, Paul Tofari, Connor Lee Dow, Vernon G Coffey, John A Hawley, Donny M Camera

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Baubak ShamimExercise and Nutrition Research Program, Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7891-9293
Brooke L DevlinExercise and Nutrition Research Program, Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ryan G TimminsSchool of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Paul TofariSchool of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Connor Lee DowSchool of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Vernon G CoffeyBond Institute of Health and Sport and Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia.
John A HawleyExercise and Nutrition Research Program, Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Donny M CameraExercise and Nutrition Research Program, Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. donny.camera@acu.edu.au.

Funding

Australian Catholic University 36331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe implemented a high-protein diet (2 g·kg

methodsThirty-two recreationally active males (age: 25 ± 5 years, body mass index: 24 ± 3 kg·m

resultsLeg press 1RM increased ~ 24 ± 13% and ~ 33 ± 16% in CET and RES from PRE-to-POST (P < 0.001), with no difference between groups. Total lean mass increased ~ 4% in both CET and RES from PRE-to-POST (P < 0.001). Ultrasound estimated vastus lateralis volume increased ~ 15% in CET and ~ 11% in RES from PRE-to-POST (P < 0.001), with no difference between groups. Wingate peak power relative to body mass displayed a trend (P = 0.053) to be greater in RES (12.5 ± 1.6 W·kg BM

conclusionDespite high protein availability, select measures of anaerobic power-based adaptations, but not muscle strength or hypertrophy, appear susceptible to 'interference effects' with CET and should be closely monitored throughout training macro-cycles. Trials Registry: This trial was registered with the Australian-New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617001229369).

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalDiet, High-ProteinMuscle StrengthResistance TrainingAdultHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30341593
PMCPMC6244626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.