Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30341493›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2019

Integrating genomic-enabled prediction and high-throughput phenotyping in breeding for climate-resilient bread wheat.

Philomin Juliana, Osval A Montesinos-López, José Crossa, Suchismita Mondal, Lorena González Pérez, Jesse Poland, Julio Huerta-Espino, Leonardo Crespo-Herrera, Velu Govindan, Susanne Dreisigacker and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. GWAS elucidated grain yield genetics in Indian spring wheat under diverse water conditions.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Philomin JulianaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, D.F., Mexico. p.juliana@cgiar.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6922-0173
Osval A Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, 28040, Mexico.
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, D.F., Mexico.
Suchismita MondalInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, D.F., Mexico.
Lorena González PérezInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, D.F., Mexico.
Jesse PolandDepartment of Plant Pathology and Agronomy, Wheat Genetics Resource Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Julio Huerta-EspinoCampo Experimental Valle de México INIFAP, Chapingo, Edo. de México, 56230, Mexico.
Leonardo Crespo-HerreraInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, D.F., Mexico.
Velu GovindanInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, D.F., Mexico.
Susanne DreisigackerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, D.F., Mexico.
Sandesh ShresthaDepartment of Plant Pathology and Agronomy, Wheat Genetics Resource Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Paulino Pérez-RodríguezColegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Edo. de México, 56230, Mexico.
Francisco Pinto EspinosaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, D.F., Mexico.
Ravi P SinghInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, D.F., Mexico. R.SINGH@CGIAR.ORG.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection and high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) are promising tools to accelerate breeding gains for high-yielding and climate-resilient wheat varieties. Hence, our objective was to evaluate them for predicting grain yield (GY) in drought-stressed (DS) and late-sown heat-stressed (HS) environments of the International maize and wheat improvement center's elite yield trial nurseries. We observed that the average genomic prediction accuracies using fivefold cross-validations were 0.50 and 0.51 in the DS and HS environments, respectively. However, when a different nursery/year was used to predict another nursery/year, the average genomic prediction accuracies in the DS and HS environments decreased to 0.18 and 0.23, respectively. While genomic predictions clearly outperformed pedigree-based predictions across nurseries, they were similar to pedigree-based predictions within nurseries due to small family sizes. In populations with some full-sibs in the training population, the genomic and pedigree-based prediction accuracies were on average 0.27 and 0.35 higher than the accuracies in populations with only one progeny per cross, indicating the importance of genetic relatedness between the training and validation populations for good predictions. We also evaluated the item-based collaborative filtering approach for multivariate prediction of GY using the green normalized difference vegetation index from HTP. This approach proved to be the best strategy for across-nursery predictions, with average accuracies of 0.56 and 0.62 in the DS and HS environments, respectively. We conclude that GY is a challenging trait for across-year predictions, but GS and HTP can be integrated in increasing the size of populations screened and evaluating unphenotyped large nurseries for stress-resilience within years.

Indexed as

ClimateModels, GeneticEdible GrainGenome, PlantGenomicsGenotypeHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysLinear ModelsPedigreePhenotypePlant BreedingQuantitative Trait, HeritableTriticum

Identifiers

PMID30341493
PMCPMC6320358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.