Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30341440›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Genetics2018

Publisher Correction: Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells.

Holly A Rees, David R Liu

Abstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Restoration of the immune system with base editing and non-genotoxic conditioning in a Rag2 point-mutant mouse model.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Prime editing of the βNature communications · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical perspective: Advancing hemophilia treatment through gene therapy approaches.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Emerging clinical applications of ADAR based RNA editing.Stem cells translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Holly A ReesMerkin Institute of Transformative Technologies in Healthcare, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
David R LiuMerkin Institute of Transformative Technologies in Healthcare, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. drliu@fas.harvard.edu.

Funding

Integrating Chemistry and Evolution to Illuminate Biology and Enable Novel TherapeuticsR35GM118062 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, DAVID R · 2016 to 2025
$6.4M
Synthesis and Discovery Through DNA-Templated ChemistryR01GM065865 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, DAVID R · 2003 to 2015
$5.1M
Expanding the Scope of Protein EvolutionR01GM065400 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, DAVID R · 2002 to 2010
$2.5M
Expanding the Scope of Base EditingU01AI142756 · NIAID · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI LIU, DAVID R · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
Continuous Evolution of Proteins with Novel Therapeutic PotentialR01EB022376 · NIBIB · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, DAVID R · 2016 to 2019
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI142756NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022376NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065400NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065865NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The originally published article contained errors in reference numbering throughout table 1 (DNA base editors and their approximate editing windows) due to the unintended propagation of reference numbering from an earlier version of the table. The article has now been corrected online. The editors apologize for this error.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.