ArticlePediatric research2018
Impaired antimicrobial response and mucosal protection induced by ibuprofen in the immature human intestine.
Article in Pediatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fibrin(ogen) Is Constitutively Expressed by Differentiated Intestinal Epithelial Cells and Mediates Wound Healing.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as indomethacin (INDO) and ibuprofen (IBU) has been shown to be an effective therapy for the closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). However, this treatment has been associated with an increased risk of developing enteropathies in neonates. Whether the use of IBU is safer than INDO for the immature intestine remains to be elucidated.
methodsThe direct impact of IBU on the human immature intestinal transcriptome was investigated using serum-free organ culture. Differentially expressed genes were analyzed with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software and compared with those previously reported with INDO. Validation of differentially expressed genes was confirmed by qPCR.
resultsWe identified several biological processes that were significantly modulated by IBU at similar levels to what had previously been observed with INDO, while the expression of genes involved in "antimicrobial response" and "mucus production" was significantly decreased exclusively by IBU in the immature intestine.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that IBU has a harmful influence on the immature intestine. In addition to exerting many of the INDO observed deleterious effects, IBU alters pathways regulating microbial colonization and intestinal epithelial defense.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.