Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30341246›Full record

ReviewBioscience reports2019

Prognostic values of F-box members in breast cancer: an online database analysis and literature review.

Xiaochen Wang, Tao Zhang, Shizhen Zhang, Jinlan Shan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioscience reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Simple and Scalable Algorithms for Cluster-Aware Precision Medicine.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The role of Fbxo5 in the development of human malignant tumors.American journal of cancer research · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaochen WangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88, Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China wangxiaochen@zju.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-2570-6064
Tao ZhangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88, Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China.
Shizhen ZhangInstitute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310029, Zhejiang, China.
Jinlan ShanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88, Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNShaoxing University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell Cycle ProteinsCell ProliferationDatabases, FactualDisease ProgressionF-Box ProteinsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisRNA, MessengerS-Phase Kinase-Associated ProteinsSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsF-Box ProteinsFBXO10 protein, humanFBXO31 protein, humanFBXO5 protein, humanRNA, MessengerSKP2 protein, humanS-Phase Kinase-Associated ProteinsTumor Suppressor Proteinsbreast cancerF-boxliterature reviewprognostic value

Identifiers

PMID30341246
PMCPMC6328874
OpenAlexW2895900625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.