ArticleBMJ open2018
Trial protocol: a multicentre randomised trial of first-line treatment pathways for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia: standard steroid treatment versus combined steroid and mycophenolate. The FLIGHT trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03156452 (A Multicentre Randomised Trial of First Line Treatment Pathways for Newly Diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicentre Randomised Trial of First Line Treatment Pathways for Newly Diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenia: Standard Steroid Treatment Versus Combined Steroid and Mycophenolate
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recommendations for the Clinical Approach to Immune Thrombocytopenia: Spanish ITP Working Group (GEPTI).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Recent progress in ITP treatment.International journal of hematology · 2023Review
- Consensus guidelines for the management of adult immune thrombocytopenia in Australia and New Zealand.The Medical journal of Australia · 2022Article
- Rapid response to mycophenolate mofetil in combination with romiplostim in a case of severe refractory immune thrombocytopenia post COVID-19 vaccination.Clinical case reports · 2021Article
- Highlights from the American society of hematology conference 2020.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2021Article
- Emerging Therapies in Immune Thrombocytopenia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Review
- Understanding Immune Thrombocytopenia: Looking Out of the Box.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionImmune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune condition that may cause thrombocytopenia-related bleeding. Current first-line ITP treatment is with high-dose corticosteroids but frequent side effects, heterogeneous responses and high relapse rates are significant problems with only 20% remaining in sustained remission with this approach. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is often used as the next treatment with efficacy in 50%-80% of patients and good tolerability but can take up to 2 months to work.
objectiveTo test the hypothesis that MMF combined with corticosteroid is a more effective first-line treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) than current standard of corticosteroid alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: DesignMulticentre, UK-based, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
settingHaematology departments in secondary care.
participantsWe plan to recruit 120 patients >16 years old with a diagnosis of ITP and a platelet count <30x10 PRIMARY OUTCOME: Time from randomisation to treatment failure defined as platelets <30x10 SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Side effects, bleeding events, remission rates, time to relapse, time to next therapy, cumulative corticosteroid dose, rescue therapy, splenectomy, socioeconomic costs, patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, fatigue, impact of bleeding, care costs). ANALYSIS: The sample size of 120 achieves a 91.5% power to detect a doubling of the median time to treatment failure from 5 to 10 months. This will be expressed as an HR with 95% CI, median time to event if more than 50% have had an event and illustrated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Cost-effectiveness will be based on the first 12 months from diagnosis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval from NRES Committee South West (IRAS number 225959). EudraCT Number: 2017-001171-23. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03156452.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.