Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30341114›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Brief intervention on Smoking, Nutrition, Alcohol and Physical (SNAP) inactivity for smoking relapse prevention after release from smoke-free prisons: a study protocol for a multicentre, investigator-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Xingzhong Jin, Stuart A Kinner, Robyn Hopkins, Emily Stockings, Ryan J Courtney, Anthony Shakeshaft, Dennis Petrie, Timothy Dobbins, Kate Dolan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluations of Muscular Strength, Ability to Balance and Health Status in Prisoners during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xingzhong JinNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4293-8665
Stuart A KinnerCentre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robyn HopkinsNorthern Territory Correctional Services, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Emily StockingsNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Ryan J CourtneyNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Anthony ShakeshaftNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Dennis PetrieMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Timothy DobbinsNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Kate DolanNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSmoking remains the leading risk factor for disease burden and mortality worldwide. Heavy Smoking is often associated with poor Nutrition, Alcohol abuse and Physical inactivity (known as 'SNAP'). Australia's first prison smoking ban was introduced in the Northern Territory in July 2013. However, relapse to smoking after release from prison is normative. Holistic and cost-effective interventions are needed to maintain post-release abstinence to realise the potential public health impact of smoke-free prison policies. Rigorous, large-scale trials of innovative and scalable interventions are crucial to inform tobacco control policies in correctional settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, investigator-blinded, randomised parallel superiority trial will evaluate the effectiveness of a brief intervention on SNAP versus usual care in preventing smoking relapse among people released from smoke-free prisons in the Northern Territory, Australia. A maximum of 824 participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned to either SNAP intervention or usual care at a 1:1 ratio at baseline. The primary endpoint is self-reported continuous smoking abstinence three months after release from prison, verified by breath carbon monoxide test. Secondary endpoints include seven-day point prevalence abstinence, time to first cigarette, number of cigarettes smoked post release, Health Eating Index for Australian Adults, Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption and International Physical Activity Questionnaire scores. The primary endpoint will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis using a simple log binomial regression model with multiple imputation for missing outcome data. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the brief intervention will be conducted subsequently. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC), Menzies HREC and Central Australia HREC. Primary results of the trial and each of the secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in a peer-review journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000217303; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Clinical Trial Protocols as TopicAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMalePrisonersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSecondary PreventionSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionTobacco Use Disorderclinical trialshealth policypublic health

Identifiers

PMID30341114
PMCPMC6196819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.