Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30341047›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Teleconsultation Using Mobile Phones for Diagnosis and Acute Care of Burn Injuries Among Emergency Physicians: Mixed-Methods Study.

Anders Klingberg, Lee Alan Wallis, Marie Hasselberg, Po-Yin Yen, Sara Caroline Fritzell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Scoping review of health information technology usability methods leveraged in Africa.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  8. Pedestrians' Perception of Pedestrian Bridges-A Qualitative Study in Dar es Salaam.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. m-Health for Burn Injury Consultations in a Low-Resource Setting: An Acceptability Study Among Health Care Providers.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Anders Klingberg *Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5937-753X
Lee Alan Wallis *Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2711-3139
Marie Hasselberg *Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6522-7941
Po-Yin Yen *Institute for Informatics, Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7061-4185
Sara Caroline Fritzell *Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8463-7759
Karolinska Institutet · SEBarnes-Jewish College · USWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe referral process in acute care remains challenging in many areas including burn care. Mobile phone apps designed explicitly for medical referrals and consultations could streamline the referral process by using structured templates and integrating features specific to different specialties. However, as these apps are competing with commercial chat services, usability becomes a crucial factor for successful uptake.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the usability of a mobile phone app for remote consultations and referrals of burn injuries.

methodsA total of 24 emergency doctors and 4 burns consultants were recruited for the study. A mixed-methods approach was used including a usability questionnaire and a think-aloud interview. Think-aloud sessions were video-recorded, and content analysis was undertaken with predefined codes relating to the following 3 themes: ease of use, usefulness of content, and technology-induced errors.

resultsThe users perceived the app to be easy to use and useful, but some problems were identified. Issues relating to usability were associated with navigation, such as scrolling and zooming. Users also had problems in understanding the meaning of some icons and terminologies. Sometimes, some users felt limited by predefined options, and they wanted to be able to freely express their clinical findings.

conclusionsWe found that users faced problems mainly with navigation when the app did not work in the same way as the other apps that were frequently used. Our study also resonates with previous findings that when using standardized templates, the systems should also allow the user to express their clinical findings in their own words.

Indexed as

burnsemergency medicinemHealthmobile phonereferral and consultationSouth Africateleconsultationsthink-aloudusability evaluationvideo analysis

Identifiers

PMID30341047
PMCPMC6231743
OpenAlexW2883525738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.